Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37958910›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Artificial Light for Improving Tomato Recovery Following Grafting: Transcriptome and Physiological Analyses.

Xiaotao Ding, Chen Miao, Rongguang Li, Lizhong He, Hongmei Zhang, Haijun Jin, Jiawei Cui, Hong Wang, Yongxue Zhang, Panling Lu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaotao DingShanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Horticultural Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Chen MiaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Horticultural Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.ORCID 0009-0002-7356-7342
Rongguang LiCollege of Ecological Technology and Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China.
Lizhong HeShanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Horticultural Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2079-3250
Hongmei ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Horticultural Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Haijun JinShanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Horticultural Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Jiawei CuiShanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Horticultural Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Hong WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Horticultural Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Yongxue ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Horticultural Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3661-3063
Panling LuShanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Horticultural Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Jun ZouCollege of Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China.
Jizhu YuShanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Horticultural Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Yuping JiangCollege of Ecological Technology and Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China.
Qiang ZhouShanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Horticultural Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNShanghai Institute of Technology · CN

Funding

the Excellent Team Program of the Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences [2022]022the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee Program 22N21900200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grafting is widely used to enhance the phenotypic traits of tomatoes, alleviate biotic and abiotic stresses, and control soil-borne diseases of the scion in greenhouse production. There are many factors that affect the healing and acclimatization stages of seedlings after grafting. However, the role of light has rarely been studied. In this study, we compared the effects of artificial light and traditional shading (under shaded plastic-covered tunnels) on the recovery of grafted tomato seedlings. The results show that the grafted tomato seedlings recovered using artificial light had a higher healthy index, leaf chlorophyll content, shoot dry weight, and net photosynthetic rate (P

Indexed as

Solanum lycopersicumTranscriptomeChlorophyllHormonesPhotosynthesisSeedlingsChlorophyllHormonesgene expressiongrafthealthy indexlightplant hormonesplant morphogenesis

Identifiers

PMID37958910
PMCPMC10650788
OpenAlexW4388298139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.