Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37958401›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Circulating Tumour DNA Guided Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decision Making in Stage II Colon Cancer-A Clinical Vignette Study.

Yat Hang To, Peter Gibbs, Jeanne Tie, Jonathan Loree, Tamara Glyn, Koen Degeling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yat Hang ToPersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1497-1700
Peter GibbsPersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Jeanne TiePersonalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Jonathan LoreeDivision of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8189-2132
Tamara GlynDepartment of Surgery, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
Koen DegelingCancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7487-2491
The University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Otago · NZWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker that may better identify stage II colon cancer (CC) patients who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) compared to standard clinicopathological parameters. The DYNAMIC study demonstrated that ctDNA-informed treatment decreased AC utilisation without compromising recurrence free survival, but medical oncologists' willingness to utilise ctDNA results to inform AC decision is unknown. Medical oncologists from Australia, Canada and New Zealand were presented with clinical vignettes for stage II CC comprised of two variables with three levels each (age: ≤50, 52-69, ≥70 years; and clinicopathological risk of recurrence: low, intermediate, high) and were queried about ctDNA testing and treatment recommendations based on results. Sixty-four colorectal oncologists completed at least one vignette (all vignettes,

Indexed as

biomarkerchemotherapycirculating tumour DNAcolon cancerdecision making

Identifiers

PMID37958401
PMCPMC10648421
OpenAlexW4388073927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.