Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37958283›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Surgical Phase Duration in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Surgical Data Science Exploration for Clinical Relevance.

Pieter De Backer, Maria Peraire Lores, Meret Demuynck, Federico Piramide, Jente Simoens, Tim Oosterlinck, Wouter Bogaert, Chi Victor Shan, Karel Van Regemorter, Aube Wastyn and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Surgeons versus computer vision: a comparative analysis on surgical phase recognition capabilities.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Pieter De BackerORSI Academy, 9090 Melle, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9375-2353
Maria Peraire LoresORSI Academy, 9090 Melle, Belgium.
Meret DemuynckDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Federico PiramideORSI Academy, 9090 Melle, Belgium.
Jente SimoensORSI Academy, 9090 Melle, Belgium.
Tim OosterlinckFaculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Wouter BogaertIbiTech-Biommeda, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Chi Victor ShanDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0008-7792-5833
Karel Van RegemorterDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0000-9882-6828
Aube WastynDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Enrico CheccucciYoung Academic Urologist-Urotechnology Working Group, NL-6803 Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7901-5608
Charlotte DebbautIbiTech-Biommeda, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1962-238X
Charles Van PraetDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Rui FarinhaORSI Academy, 9090 Melle, Belgium.
Ruben De GrooteDepartment of Urology, Onze-Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.
Anthony GallagherORSI Academy, 9090 Melle, Belgium.
Karel DecaesteckerDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0767-940X
Alexandre MottrieORSI Academy, 9090 Melle, Belgium.

Funding

Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneurship HBC.2020.2252Ipsen NV A20/TT/1655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Surgical phases form the basic building blocks for surgical skill assessment, feedback, and teaching. The phase duration itself and its correlation with clinical parameters at diagnosis have not yet been investigated. Novel commercial platforms provide phase indications but have not been assessed for accuracy yet. (2) Methods: We assessed 100 robot-assisted partial nephrectomy videos for phase durations based on previously defined proficiency metrics. We developed an annotation framework and subsequently compared our annotations to an existing commercial solution (Touch Surgery, Medtronic™). We subsequently explored clinical correlations between phase durations and parameters derived from diagnosis and treatment. (3) Results: An objective and uniform phase assessment requires precise definitions derived from an iterative revision process. A comparison to a commercial solution shows large differences in definitions across phases. BMI and the duration of renal tumor identification are positively correlated, as are tumor complexity and both tumor excision and renorrhaphy duration. (4) Conclusions: The surgical phase duration can be correlated with certain clinical outcomes. Further research should investigate whether the retrieved correlations are also clinically meaningful. This requires an increase in dataset sizes and facilitation through intelligent computer vision algorithms. Commercial platforms can facilitate this dataset expansion and help unlock the full potential, provided that the phase annotation details are disclosed.

Indexed as

partial nephrectomyphase duration assessmentsurgical data sciencevideo analysis

Identifiers

PMID37958283
PMCPMC10650909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.