Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37958267›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in MM Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Ehsan Alipour, Atefe Pooyan, Firoozeh Shomal Zadeh, Azad Duke Darbandi, Pietro Andrea Bonaffini, Majid Chalian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ehsan AlipourDepartment of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Atefe PooyanDepartment of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Firoozeh Shomal ZadehDepartment of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Azad Duke DarbandiChicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
Pietro Andrea BonaffiniDepartment of Radiology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5335-9429
Majid ChalianDepartment of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8400-1593

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has attracted increasing attention as a tool for the detection and management of several medical conditions. Multiple myeloma (MM), a malignancy characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of plasma cells, is one of the most common hematologic malignancies, which relies on imaging for diagnosis and management. We aimed to review the current literature and trends in AI research of MM imaging. This study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Three main concepts were used in the search algorithm, including "artificial intelligence" in "radiologic examinations" of patients with "multiple myeloma". The algorithm was used to search the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Articles were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the end, we used the checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) criteria to evaluate the manuscripts. We provided the percentage of studies that were compliant with each criterion as a measure of the quality of AI research on MM. The initial search yielded 977 results. After reviewing them, 14 final studies were selected. The studies used a wide array of imaging modalities. Radiomics analysis and segmentation tasks were the most popular studies (10/14 studies). The common purposes of radiomics studies included the differentiation of MM bone lesions from other lesions and the prediction of relapse. The goal of the segmentation studies was to develop algorithms for the automatic segmentation of important structures in MM. Dice score was the most common assessment tool in segmentation studies, which ranged from 0.80 to 0.97. These studies show that imaging is a valuable data source for medical AI models and plays an even greater role in the management of MM.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningmultiple myelomaradiologyradiomicssegmentation

Identifiers

PMID37958267
PMCPMC10650900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.