ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Diagnostic Approach to Pulmonary B-Cell Lymphomas in Small Biopsies, with Practical Recommendations to Avoid Misinterpretation.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case of lymphomatoid granulomatosis with renal involvement.CEN case reports · 2026Article
- Non-gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas: a narrative review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment strategies.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Pulmonary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with concurrent organizing pneumonia: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary lymphomas are rare. With the current less invasive approaches used to obtain material for diagnosis, the diagnosis of pulmonary lymphoma is now frequently established in a small biopsy rather than in a resection. Therefore, the diagnosis has become more challenging and requires correlation with the clinico-radiologic presentation and with ancillary studies (immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, cytogenetics, and/or molecular analysis). Due to the rarity of pulmonary lymphomas, clinical suspicion of a lymphomatous process is low at initial presentation, and material may be only submitted for histopathology. For this reason, herein, we provide recommendations to arrive at the correct diagnosis of the most common lung B-cell lymphomas (marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, intravascular large B-cell lymphoma, lymphomatoid granulomatosis) in the setting of small biopsies, utilizing only immunohistochemistry. The differential diagnosis varies according to the lymphoma subtype and includes reactive conditions, solid tumors, and other hematolymphoid malignancies. Although morphology and immunohistochemistry may be sufficient to establish a diagnosis, in some cases, the best recommendation is to obtain additional tissue via a VATS biopsy/wedge resection with material submitted for flow cytometry, cytogenetics, and/or molecular studies to be able to properly classify a pulmonary lymphoid process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.