Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37958207›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia after Bariatric Surgery: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Roberta Maselli, Matteo Fiacca, Gaia Pellegatta, Roberto de Sire, Federico De Blasio, Antonio Capogreco, Piera Alessia Galtieri, Davide Massimi, Manuela Trotta, Cesare Hassan and 1 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roberta MaselliHumanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Matteo FiaccaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy.
Gaia PellegattaHumanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Roberto de SireDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6448-2649
Federico De BlasioDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9243-7661
Antonio CapogrecoHumanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Piera Alessia GaltieriHumanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Davide MassimiHumanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Manuela TrottaHumanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7086-1939
Cesare HassanHumanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Alessandro RepiciHumanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAchalasia following bariatric surgery is a rare phenomenon with diverse potential physiopathological origins.

aimsThis article aims to explore the hypothetical physiopathological connection between bariatric surgery and the subsequent onset of achalasia. MATERIAL AND

methodsA review was conducted to identify studies reporting cases of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after bariatric procedures and detailing the outcomes in terms of the technical and clinical success. Additionally, a case of a successful POEM performed on a patient two years after undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is presented.

resultsThe selection criteria yielded eight studies encompassing 40 patients treated with POEM for achalasia after bariatric surgery: 34 after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and 6 after LSG. The studies reported an overall technical success rate of 97.5%, with clinical success achieved in 85% of cases. Adverse events were minimal, with only one case of esophageal leak treated endoscopically. However, a postprocedural symptomatic evaluation was notably lacking in most of the included studies.

conclusionsAchalasia poses a considerable challenge within the bariatric surgery population. POEM has emerged as a technically viable and safe intervention for this patient demographic, providing an effective treatment option where surgical alternatives for achalasia are limited. Our findings highlight the promising outcomes of POEM in these patients, but the existing data remain limited. Hence, prospective studies are needed to elucidate the optimal pre-surgical assessment and timing of endoscopic procedures for optimizing outcomes.

Indexed as

achalasiabariatric surgerydysphagiaPOEM

Identifiers

PMID37958207
PMCPMC10647658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.