ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023
Genetic Variance Estimation over Time in Broiler Breeding Programmes for Growth and Reproductive Traits.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using deep learning models as a genetic architecture for the simulation of breeding schemes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Recent population history in Swedish cattle breeds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Nociceptive thresholds in broiler chickens are modulated by lameness of their progenitors and sex category.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Tissue-specific differences of gene expression variance in mutation accumulation lines of mice.Heredity · 2026Article
- Using predictivity to estimate heritabilities and genetic correlations over time for growth traits in a large genotyped angus cattle population.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Estimation of heritabilities and genetic correlations by time slices using predictivity in large genomic models.Genetics · 2025Article
- Heritability and Genetic Correlation of Age at First Egg and Egg Number up to 40 Weeks of Age After Long-Term Selection in Taiwan Indigenous Chicken.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Growth resilience to weather variation in commercial free-ranging chickens in Ethiopia.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Estradiol-17ß, progesterone, and oviductal changes in muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata forma domestica) during reproductive phases.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Impact of genomic selection for growth and carcass traits on foot structure in Angus cattle.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Temporal dynamics of genetic parameters and SNP effects for performance and disorder traits in poultry undergoing genomic selection.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Potential negative effects of genomic selection.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Delineating maternal influence in regulation of variance in major economic traits of White Leghorns: Bayesian insights.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring the genetic variance of traits is a key priority to ensure the sustainability of breeding programmes in populations under directional selection, since directional selection can decrease genetic variation over time. Studies monitoring changes in genetic variation have typically used long-term data from small experimental populations selected for a handful of traits. Here, we used a large dataset from a commercial breeding line spread over a period of twenty-three years. A total of 2,059,869 records and 2,062,112 animals in the pedigree were used for the estimations of variance components for the traits: body weight (BWT; 2,059,869 records) and hen-housed egg production (HHP; 45,939 records). Data were analysed with three estimation approaches: sliding overlapping windows, under frequentist (restricted maximum likelihood (REML)) and Bayesian (Gibbs sampling) methods; expected variances using coefficients of the full relationship matrix; and a "double trait covariances" analysis by computing correlations and covariances between the same trait in two distinct consecutive windows. The genetic variance showed marginal fluctuations in its estimation over time. Whereas genetic, maternal permanent environmental, and residual variances were similar for BWT in both the REML and Gibbs methods, variance components when using the Gibbs method for HHP were smaller than the variances estimated when using REML. Large data amounts were needed to estimate variance components and detect their changes. For Gibbs (REML), the changes in genetic variance from 1999-2001 to 2020-2022 were 82.29 to 93.75 (82.84 to 93.68) for BWT and 76.68 to 95.67 (98.42 to 109.04) for HHP. Heritability presented a similar pattern as the genetic variance estimation, changing from 0.32 to 0.36 (0.32 to 0.36) for BWT and 0.16 to 0.15 (0.21 to 0.18) for HHP. On the whole, genetic parameters tended slightly to increase over time. The expected variance estimates were lower than the estimates when using overlapping windows. That indicates the low effect of the drift-selection process on the genetic variance, or likely, the presence of genetic variation sources compensating for the loss. Double trait covariance analysis confirmed the maintenance of variances over time, presenting genetic correlations >0.86 for BWT and >0.82 for HHP. Monitoring genetic variance in broiler breeding programmes is important to sustain genetic progress. Although the genetic variances of both traits fluctuated over time, in some windows, particularly between 2003 and 2020, increasing trends were observed, which warrants further research on the impact of other factors, such as novel mutations, operating on the dynamics of genetic variance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.