Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37958022›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Comparative Analysis of Patient Satisfaction Surveys-A Crucial Role in Raising the Standard of Healthcare Services.

Karoly Bancsik, Codrin Dan Nicolae Ilea, Mădălina Diana Daina, Raluca Bancsik, Corina Lacramioara Șuteu, Simona Daciana Bîrsan, Felicia Manole, Lucia Georgeta Daina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Healthcare Services in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karoly BancsikFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Doctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 1 December Sq., 410081 Oradea, Romania.
Codrin Dan Nicolae IleaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Doctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 1 December Sq., 410081 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0612-4704
Mădălina Diana DainaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1 December Sq., 410081 Oradea, Romania.
Raluca BancsikClinical Emergency Hospital "Avram Iancu", 410027 Oradea, Romania.
Corina Lacramioara ȘuteuDepartment of Psycho-Neurosciences and Recovery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1 December Sq., 410081 Oradea, Romania.
Simona Daciana BîrsanDepartment of Psycho-Neurosciences and Recovery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1 December Sq., 410081 Oradea, Romania.
Felicia ManoleDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410081 Oradea, Romania.
Lucia Georgeta DainaDepartment of Psycho-Neurosciences and Recovery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1 December Sq., 410081 Oradea, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The study aimed to assess the patients' perception of the quality of the medical staff's care, the hotel's services, and the hospital's overall impression as well as to determine the best rating scale through a comparative analysis of patient satisfaction questionnaires. (2) Methods: A retrospective study was performed based on satisfaction questionnaires addressed to the patients hospitalized in the Orthopedics and Traumatology departments of the County Clinical Emergency Hospital Oradea between 2015 and 2019. Three different types of questionnaires were used during the study period, with the number of questions varying between 30 (variant A) and 37 (variant C). The evaluation was done using the Likert scales with three, four, or five answer variables. (3) Results: The items that we found to be present in all three categories of surveys and for which at least two different questionnaire variants used the Likert scales with various answer variables were chosen. In terms of the treatment given by the medical staff, hotel services, and the overall perception of the hospital, the patients perceive a higher level of quality. (4) Conclusions: The level of patient overall satisfaction or general impression about the hospital is strongly dependent on the quality of medical care provided by the doctors and the specific hotel conditions of the hospital. The quality assessment using the Likert rating scale with five binary variables is more accurate.

Indexed as

general impression of the hospitalpatient-perceived quality assessment (PPQA) questionnairequality managementquality of medical caresatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID37958022
PMCPMC10647670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.