Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957966›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Development, Objectives and Operation of Return-of-Service Bursary Schemes as an Investment to Build Health Workforce Capacity in South Africa: A Multi-Methods Study.

Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda, Andrea Durbach, Wezile W Chitha, Paidamoyo Bodzo, Blake Angell, Rohina Joshi

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sikhumbuzo A MabundaSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9458-3742
Andrea DurbachAustralian Human Rights Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6759-0899
Wezile W ChithaHealth Systems Enablement and Innovation Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5837-924X
Paidamoyo BodzoHealth Systems Enablement and Innovation Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3332-9115
Blake AngellThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7188-7740
Rohina JoshiSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3374-401X

Funding

National Heart Foundation 102059NHMRC GNT2010055UNSW Sydney 0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSouth Africa uses government-funded return-of-service (RoS) schemes to train, recruit and retain skilled health professionals in underserved areas. These educate health professionals locally or internationally in return for a commitment to serve in a specified area for an agreed period. While such schemes are used widely and are funded by substantial public funds, their exact makeup differs across jurisdictions, and little is known about why these differences have emerged or how they influence their effectiveness or impact on the health system. We aimed to fill these gaps through an analysis of the origins, architecture, and evolution of RoS schemes in South Africa.

methodsA multimethod research study including a policy review, a literature review, and semi-structured interviews of policymakers was undertaken between October 2020 and August 2022. The included policy documents and literature were analysed using the Walt and Gilson framework and narrative synthesis. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive, thematic analysis in NVIVO 12.

resultsRoS schemes are used as a recruitment and retention strategy and a mechanism to address equity in access to medical education. Whilst there is evidence of RoS schemes existing in 1950, no evidence of beneficiaries was found in databases until 1989. The impact of these schemes is likely being limited by sub-optimal institutional arrangements and poor transparency in their design and implementation.

conclusionDespite rigorous research methods, the origins of RoS policies in South Africa could not be established due to poor preservation of institutional memory. Opportunities to monitor the value of public investment into RoS programs are being missed and often the underlying objective of the programs has not been well-specified. Policies were found to have been developed and operate in isolation from other health workforce planning activities and thus may not be maximising their impact as a retention and training tool.

Indexed as

bursaryhealth policyhealth systemhealth workforcehuman resourcesreturn of service or RoS

Identifiers

PMID37957966
PMCPMC10648181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.