ArticleBrain and behavior2023
Natural history of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the United Kingdom: A descriptive study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Improving survival in Duchenne muscular dystrophy across eras: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Preventing Cardiomyopathy in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients in the Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Drug-Trial of Perindopril and Bisoprolol.European journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- FDA-approved antisense oligonucleotide therapies for duchenne muscular dystrophy: current status and future outlook.RNA biology · 2026Review
- A Real-World Target Trial Emulation of Eteplirsen, Casimersen, and Golodirsen to Evaluate Survival Among Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Echocardiography in duchenne muscular dystrophy: a call for consistency and standardisation of reporting.Echo research and practice · 2026Review
- Systematic mapping of rare genetic disease studies using UK primary care electronic health records.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Cardiac MRI in cardiac dystrophinopathy: recommendations on imaging.Open heart · 2026Review
- Systematic Literature Reviews of Health-State Utility Values, Costs, and Healthcare Resource Use in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- Clinical challenges of an Xp21 contiguous gene deletion syndrome in a newborn and 15 months of follow-up - case report.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Bridging science and hope: the evolving story of gene therapy for neuromuscular diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Review
- Survival in Duchenne muscular dystrophy in Australia: a 50 year retrospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Natural history of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the United Kingdom: A descriptive study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare, muscle-degenerative disease predominantly affecting males. Natural history models capture the full disease pathway under current care and combine with estimates of new interventions' effects to assess cost-effectiveness by health technology decision-makers. These models require mortality estimates throughout a patient's lifetime, but rare disease datasets typically contain relatively few patients with short follow-ups. Alternative (published) sources of mortality data may therefore be required.
methodsThe Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) was evaluated as a source of mortality and natural history data for future economic evaluations of health technologies for DMD and rare diseases in general in the UK population. This retrospective longitudinal cohort study provides flexible parametric estimates of mortality rates and survival probabilities in the current UK DMD population through primary/secondary records in the CPRD since 1990. It also investigates clinically significant milestones such as corticosteroid use, spinal surgery, and cardiomyopathy in these patients.
resultsA total of 1121 male patients were included in the study, observed from 0.7 to 48.9 years. Median life expectancy was 25.64 years (95% confidence interval 24.73, 26.47), consistent with previous global estimates. This has improved to 26.47 (25.16, 27.89) years in patients born after 1990. The median ages at corticosteroid initiation, spinal surgery, ventilation, and cardiomyopathy diagnosis were 6.06 years (5.77, 6.29), 14.79 years (14.29, 15.09), 16.97 years (16.50, 18.31), and 15.26 years (14.22, 16.70), respectively.
conclusionsEstimates of mortality in UK-based DMD patients are age-specific in a uniquely large and nationally representative sample from the CPRD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.