SynthesisCurrent rheumatology reviews2024
Clinical Applicability of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for the Treatment of Osteochondral Defects: A Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Current rheumatology reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spheroid-based matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation combined with autologous bone grafting restores physiological cartilage and subchondral bone properties in osteochondral knee defects-An MRI-based analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOsteoarthritis and other joint disorders are the leading cause of disability in the elderly and the treatment of joint lesions is challenging. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has been reported with variable effects for the treatment of osteochondral and other joint lesions. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis of the recent literature to determine the clinical applicability of ACI for osteochondral defects.
methodsA meta-analysis was performed on the recent literature showing the effects of ACI on osteochondral defects. The PUBMED, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases were used to identify eligible studies from Jan 2010 to Sep 2022. Both fixed and random models of meta-analysis were applied with all reported scoring systems to quantify the effectiveness of ACI on osteochondral defects.
resultsThe pool data of 965 patients as a case series after ACI from a fixed model showed a significant improvement in the osteochondral defects (odds ratio = 8.75, 95%CI = 7.127 to 10.743, p = 0.000). These results were further verified by a random model of meta-analysis. The data also showed a substantial heterogeneity among the studies used in the meta-analysis (Q-value = 160.41, I-squared = 87.53, p = 0.000). Furthermore, this meta-analysis also compared different ACI procedures with different scoring systems but the overall outcome remains the same as ACI was found to be useful for the healing of the osteochondral defects.
conclusionThis meta-analysis of 965 case series revealed that the ACI markedly improved the damage osteochondral defects scores but the optimal treatment is still controversial, therefore further studies are needed to validate these findings in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.