Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957750›Full record

Trial reportJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2023

Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients.

Kerstin Wimmer, Monika Sachet, Cristiano Ramos, Sophie Frantal, Hanna Birnleitner, Christine Brostjan, Ruth Exner, Martin Filipits, Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath, Margaretha Rudas and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Diterpenes: Nature's Hidden Gems of Immunomodulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Three-agent Regimen for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Treatment.Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kerstin WimmerDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Monika SachetDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Cristiano RamosDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Sophie FrantalAustrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Hanna BirnleitnerDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Christine BrostjanDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Ruth ExnerDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Martin FilipitsAustrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Zsuzsanna Bago-HorvathAustrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Margaretha RudasDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Rupert BartschAustrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Michael GnantAustrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Christian F SingerAustrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Marija BalicAustrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Daniel EgleAustrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Rudolf OehlerDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. rudolf.oehler@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2891-7155
Florian FitzalDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATAustrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group · ATInnsbruck Medical University · ATMedical University of Graz · ATMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel (D) are commonly used in a sequential regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of early, high-risk or locally advanced breast cancer (BC). Novel approaches to increase the response rate combine this treatment with immunotherapies such as PD-1 inhibition. However, the expected stimulatory effect on lymphocytes may depend on the chemotherapy backbone. Therefore, we separately compared the immunomodulatory effects of EC and D in the setting of a randomized clinical trial.

methodsTumor and blood samples of 154 patients from the ABCSG-34 trial were available (76 patients received four cycles of EC followed by four cycles of D; 78 patients get the reverse treatment sequence). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, circulating lymphocytes and 14 soluble immune mediators were determined at baseline and at drug change. Furthermore, six BC cell lines were treated with E, C or D and co-cultured with immune cells.

resultsInitial treatment with four cycles of EC reduced circulating B and T cells by 94% and 45%, respectively. In contrast, no comparable effects on lymphocytes were observed in patients treated with initial four cycles of D. Most immune mediators decreased under EC whereas D-treatment resulted in elevated levels of CXCL10, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its soluble receptor (suPAR). Accordingly, only the exposure of BC cell lines to D induced similar increases as compared to E. While treatment of BC cells with E was associated with cell shrinkage and apoptosis, D induced cell swelling and accumulation of cells in G2 phase.

conclusionThe deleterious effect of EC on lymphocytes indicates strong immunosuppressive properties of this combination therapy. D, in contrast, has no effect on lymphocytes, but triggers the secretion of stimulatory proteins in vivo and in vitro, indicating a supportive effect on the immune system. Underlying differences in the induced cell death might be causal. These divergent immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel should be considered when planning future combinations with immunotherapies in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCyclophosphamideDocetaxelEpirubicinFemaleFluorouracilHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyTreatment OutcomeCyclophosphamideDocetaxelEpirubicinFluorouracilBreast cancerDocetaxelEpirubicinImmune cellsImmunomodulatory markersNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPrediction of response to chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37957750
PMCPMC10644559
OpenAlexW4388646500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.