Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957690›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Early prediction of in-hospital mortality utilizing multivariate predictive modelling of electronic medical records and socio-determinants of health of the first day of hospitalization.

Daniel Stoessel, Rui Fa, Svetlana Artemova, Ursula von Schenck, Hadiseh Nowparast Rostami, Pierre-Ephrem Madiot, Caroline Landelle, Fréderic Olive, Alison Foote, Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel StoesselLife Science Analytics, Clinical Solutions, Elsevier, Berlin, Germany.
Rui FaElsevier Health Analytics, London, UK.
Svetlana ArtemovaPublic Health Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, F-38000, France.
Ursula von SchenckLife Science Analytics, Clinical Solutions, Elsevier, Berlin, Germany.
Hadiseh Nowparast RostamiLife Science Analytics, Clinical Solutions, Elsevier, Berlin, Germany.
Pierre-Ephrem MadiotDigital Services Management, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, F-38000, France.
Caroline LandellePublic Health Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, F-38000, France.
Fréderic OlivePublic Health Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, F-38000, France.
Alison FootePublic Health Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, F-38000, France.
Alexandre Moreau-GaudryPublic Health Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, F-38000, France.
Jean-Luc BossonPublic Health Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, F-38000, France. jean-luc.bosson@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.
Université Grenoble Alpes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRRELX Group (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn France an average of 4% of hospitalized patients die during their hospital stay. To aid medical decision making and the attribution of resources, within a few days of admission the identification of patients at high risk of dying in hospital is essential.

methodsWe used de-identified routine patient data available in the first 2 days of hospitalization in a French University Hospital (between 2016 and 2018) to build models predicting in-hospital mortality (at ≥ 2 and ≤ 30 days after admission). We tested nine different machine learning algorithms with repeated 10-fold cross-validation. Models were trained with 283 variables including age, sex, socio-determinants of health, laboratory test results, procedures (Classification of Medical Acts), medications (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code), hospital department/unit and home address (urban, rural etc.). The models were evaluated using various performance metrics. The dataset contained 123,729 admissions, of which the outcome for 3542 was all-cause in-hospital mortality and 120,187 admissions (no death reported within 30 days) were controls.

resultsThe support vector machine, logistic regression and Xgboost algorithms demonstrated high discrimination with a balanced accuracy of 0.81 (95%CI 0.80-0.82), 0.82 (95%CI 0.80-0.83) and 0.83 (95%CI 0.80-0.83) and AUC of 0.90 (95%CI 0.88-0.91), 0.90 (95%CI 0.89-0.91) and 0.90 (95%CI 0.89-0.91) respectively. The most predictive variables for in-hospital mortality in all three models were older age (greater risk), and admission with a confirmed appointment (reduced risk).

conclusionWe propose three highly discriminating machine-learning models that could improve clinical and organizational decision making for adult patients at hospital admission.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHospitalizationAdultHospital MortalityHospitals, UniversityHumansLogistic ModelsRetrospective StudiesAll-cause in-hospital mortalityClinical decision makingData at hospital admissionMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37957690
PMCPMC10644472
OpenAlexW4388627194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.