Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957676›Full record

Trial reportJournal of foot and ankle research2023

Nonsurgical management of hallux valgus: findings of a randomised pilot and feasibility trial.

Hylton B Menz, Polly Q X Lim, Sheree E Hurn, Karen J Mickle, Andrew K Buldt, Matthew P Cotchett, Edward Roddy, Anita E Wluka, Bircan Erbas, Mehak Batra and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Advances in surgical management of severe hallux valgus].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hylton B MenzSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia. h.menz@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-3846
Polly Q X LimSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2796-2272
Sheree E HurnSchool of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4638-6597
Karen J MickleApplied Sport Science and Exercise Testing Laboratory, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, 2258, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-3275
Andrew K BuldtSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-2780
Matthew P CotchettSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6966-5324
Edward RoddyPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8954-7082
Anita E WlukaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8024-9049
Bircan ErbasSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-418X
Mehak BatraSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2273-4948
Shannon E MunteanuSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6780-2743
La Trobe University · AUHunter Water · AUMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBMonash University · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

La Trobe University La Trobe UniversityNational Health and Medical Research Council 1135995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHallux valgus is a common and disabling condition. This randomised pilot and feasibility trial aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a nonsurgical intervention for reducing pain associated with hallux valgus.

methodsTwenty-eight community-dwelling women with painful hallux valgus were randomised to receive either a multifaceted, nonsurgical intervention (footwear, foot orthoses, foot exercises, advice, and self-management) or usual care (advice and self-management alone). Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was feasibility, evaluated according to demand (recruitment rate and conversion rate), acceptability, adherence, adverse events, and retention rate. Limited efficacy testing was conducted on secondary outcome measures including foot pain, foot muscle strength, general health-related quality of life, use of cointerventions, and participants' perception of overall treatment effect.

resultsBetween July 8, 2021, and April 22, 2022, we recruited and tested 28 participants (aged 44 to 80 years, mean 60.7, standard deviation 10.7). This period encompassed two COVID-related stay-at-home orders (July 16 to July 27, and August 5 to October 21, 2021). The predetermined feasibility thresholds were met for retention rate, foot pain, mental health-related quality of life, and use of cointerventions, partly met for acceptability, adverse events, and muscle strength, and not met for demand (recruitment rate or conversion rate), adherence, physical health-related quality of life and perception of overall treatment effect.

conclusionIn its current form, a randomised trial of footwear, foot orthoses, foot exercises, advice and self-management for relieving pain associated with hallux valgus is not feasible, particularly due to the low adherence with the intervention. However, it is difficult to determine whether the trial would be feasible under different circumstances, particularly due to COVID-19 stay-at-home orders. Future trials will need to consider improving the aesthetics of the footwear and making the exercise program less burdensome.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12621000645853).

Indexed as

Hallux ValgusAustraliaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPainPilot ProjectsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID37957676
PMCPMC10642001
OpenAlexW4388635024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.