Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957667›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2023

PROACTING: predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer from routine diagnostic histopathology biopsies with deep learning.

Witali Aswolinskiy, Enrico Munari, Hugo M Horlings, Lennart Mulder, Giuseppe Bogina, Joyce Sanders, Yat-Hee Liu, Alexandra W van den Belt-Dusebout, Leslie Tessier, Maschenka Balkenhol and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Predictive score for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage HR + /HER2- breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  18. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Witali AswolinskiyDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Enrico Munari *Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Hugo M Horlings *The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lennart MulderThe Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Giuseppe BoginaPathology Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Joyce SandersThe Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yat-Hee LiuThe Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexandra W van den Belt-DuseboutThe Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Leslie TessierDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maschenka BalkenholDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michelle StegemanDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jeffrey HovenDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jelle WesselingThe Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen van der LaakDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Esther H Lips *The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Francesco Ciompi *Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. francesco.ciompi@radboudumc.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive breast cancer patients are increasingly being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, only a fraction of the patients respond to it completely. To prevent overtreatment, there is an urgent need for biomarkers to predict treatment response before administering the therapy.

methodsIn this retrospective study, we developed hypothesis-driven interpretable biomarkers based on deep learning, to predict the pathological complete response (pCR, i.e., the absence of tumor cells in the surgical resection specimens) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy solely using digital pathology H&E images of pre-treatment breast biopsies. Our approach consists of two steps: First, we use deep learning to characterize aspects of the tumor micro-environment by detecting mitoses and segmenting tissue into several morphology compartments including tumor, lymphocytes and stroma. Second, we derive computational biomarkers from the segmentation and detection output to encode slide-level relationships of components of the tumor microenvironment, such as tumor and mitoses, stroma, and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs).

resultsWe developed and evaluated our method on slides from n = 721 patients from three European medical centers with triple-negative and Luminal B breast cancers and performed external independent validation on n = 126 patients from a public dataset. We report the predictive value of the investigated biomarkers for predicting pCR with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve between 0.66 and 0.88 across the tested cohorts.

conclusionThe proposed computational biomarkers predict pCR, but will require more evaluation and finetuning for clinical application. Our results further corroborate the potential role of deep learning to automate TILs quantification, and their predictive value in breast cancer neoadjuvant treatment planning, along with automated mitoses quantification. We made our method publicly available to extract segmentation-based biomarkers for research purposes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkersBiopsyFemaleHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkersComputational biomarkerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathological complete response

Identifiers

PMID37957667
PMCPMC10644597
OpenAlexW4388630880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.