Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957658›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Developing public health competency statements and frameworks: a scoping review and thematic analysis of approaches.

Melissa MacKay, Caitlin Ford, Lauren E Grant, Andrew Papadopoulos, Jennifer E McWhirter

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Building the future of public health in Canada: A modified Delphi survey for updated core competencies.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Public Health Communication Competency Framework: Results from a multi-method and consensus-building process.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melissa MacKayDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Caitlin FordDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Lauren E GrantDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Andrew PapadopoulosDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Jennifer E McWhirterDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. j.mcwhirter@uoguelph.ca.

Funding

CIHR FRN 184647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competencies ensure public health students and professionals have the necessary knowledge, skills, values, and behaviours to do their jobs effectively. Public health is a dynamic and complex field requiring robust competency statements and frameworks that are regularly renewed. Many countries have public health competencies, but there has been no evidence synthesis on how these are developed. Our research aim was to synthesize the extent and nature of the literature on approaches and best practices for competencies statement and framework development in the context of public health, including identifying the relevant literature on approaches for developing competency statements and frameworks for public health students and professionals using a scoping review; and, synthesizing and describing approaches and best practices for developing public health competency statements and frameworks using a thematic analysis of the literature identified by the scoping review. We conducted a scoping review and thematic analysis of the academic and grey literature to synthesize and describe approaches and best practices for developing public health competency statements and frameworks. A systematic search of six databases uncovered 13 articles for inclusion. To scope the literature, articles were assessed for characteristics including study aim, design, methods, key results, gaps, and future research recommendations. Most included articles were peer-reviewed journal articles, used qualitative or mixed method design, and were focused on general, rather than specialist, public health practitioners. Thematic analysis resulted in the generation of six analytical themes that describe the multi-method approaches utilized in developing competency statements and frameworks including literature reviews, expert consultation, and consensus-building. There was variability in the transparency of competency framework development, with challenges balancing foundational and discipline-specific competencies. Governance, and intersectoral and interdisciplinary competency, are needed to address complex public health issues. Understanding approaches and best practices for competency statement and framework development will support future evidence-informed iterations of public health competencies.

Indexed as

Professional CompetencePublic HealthDatabases, FactualHumansPeer ReviewBehavioursCompetenciesCompetency frameworksKnowledgePublic healthSkillsValues

Identifiers

PMID37957658
PMCPMC10644570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.