Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957606›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2023

Ultra-sensitive CTC-based liquid biopsy for pancreatic cancer enabled by large blood volume analysis.

Nikolas H Stoecklein, Georg Fluegen, Rosa Guglielmi, Rui P L Neves, Thilo Hackert, Emrullah Birgin, Stefan A Cieslik, Monica Sudarsanam, Christiane Driemel, Guus van Dalum and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pancreatic cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Liquid Biopsy: The Challenges of a Revolutionary Approach in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nikolas H Stoecklein *General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. Nikolas.Stoecklein@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Georg Fluegen *General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Rosa Guglielmi *General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Rui P L Neves *General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Thilo HackertDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Emrullah BirginDepartment of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Stefan A CieslikGeneral, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Monica SudarsanamGeneral, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christiane DriemelGeneral, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Guus van DalumGeneral, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
André FrankenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Dieter NiederacherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hans NeubauerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Tanja FehmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jutta M RoxDepartment of Transplantation Diagnostics and Cell Therapeutics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Petra BöhmeInstitute of Forensic Medicine Düsseldorf, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lena HäberleInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Wolfgang GöringInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Irene EspositoInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Stefan A ToppGeneral, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Frank A W CoumansDecisive Science, Ertskade 10, 1019 BB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jürgen WeitzGeneral, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Wolfram T KnoefelGeneral, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Johannes C Fischer *Department of Transplantation Diagnostics and Cell Therapeutics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ulrich Bork *Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Nuh N Rahbari *Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. nuh.rahbari@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The limited sensitivity of circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) stems from their extremely low concentration in the whole circulating blood, necessitating enhanced detection methodologies. This study sought to amplify assay-sensitivity by employing diagnostic leukapheresis (DLA) to screen large blood volumes. Sixty patients were subjected to DLA, with a median processed blood volume of ~ 2.8 L and approximately 5% of the resulting DLA-product analyzed using CellSearch (CS). Notably, DLA significantly increased CS-CTC detection to 44% in M0-patients and 74% in M1-patients, yielding a 60-fold increase in CS-CTC enumeration. DLA also provided sufficient CS-CTCs for genomic profiling, thereby delivering additional genomic information compared to tissue biopsy samples. DLA CS-CTCs exhibited a pronounced negative prognostic impact on overall survival (OS), evidenced by a reduction in OS from 28.6 to 8.5 months (univariate: p = 0.002; multivariable: p = 0.043). Additionally, a marked enhancement in sensitivity was achieved (by around 3-4-times) compared to peripheral blood (PB) samples, with positive predictive values for OS being preserved at around 90%. Prognostic relevance of CS-CTCs in PDAC was further validated in PB-samples from 228 PDAC patients, consolidating the established association between CTC-presence and reduced OS (8.5 vs. 19.0 months, p < 0.001). In conclusion, DLA-derived CS-CTCs may serve as a viable tool for identifying high-risk PDAC-patients and aiding the optimization of multimodal treatment strategies. Moreover, DLA enables comprehensive diagnostic profiling by providing ample CTC material, reinforcing its utility as a reliable liquid-biopsy approach. This high-volume liquid-biopsy strategy presents a potential pathway for enhancing clinical management in this malignancy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBlood VolumeHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, TumorCirculating tumor cellsCTC profilingCTCsDiagnostic leukapheresisDLAHigh-blood volume analysisLiquid biopsyPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaPDACSingle cell genomics

Identifiers

PMID37957606
PMCPMC10641981
OpenAlexW4388637384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.