Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957568›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2023

Evaluation of a novel biomechanics-informed walking frame, developed through a Knowledge Transfer Partnership between biomechanists and design engineers.

Sibylle Brunhilde Thies, Susan Bevan, Matthew Wassall, Blessy Kurissinkal Shajan, Lydia Chowalloor, Laurence Kenney, Dave Howard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sibylle Brunhilde ThiesCentre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Brian Blatchford Building Room PO28, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK. s.thies@salford.ac.uk.
Susan BevanNRS Healthcare, Coalville, LE67 1UB, Leicestershire, UK.
Matthew WassallCentre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Brian Blatchford Building Room PO28, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Blessy Kurissinkal ShajanCentre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Brian Blatchford Building Room PO28, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Lydia ChowalloorCentre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Brian Blatchford Building Room PO28, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Laurence KenneyCentre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Brian Blatchford Building Room PO28, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Dave HowardCentre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Brian Blatchford Building Room PO28, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Blatchford (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Innovate UK 012227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWalking aids such as walking frames offer support during walking, yet paradoxically, people who self-report using them remain more likely to fall than people who do not. Lifting of walking frames when crossing door thresholds or when turning has shown to reduce stability, and certain design features drive the need to lift (e.g. small, non-swivelling wheels at the front). To overcome shortfalls in design and provide better stability, biomechanists and industrial engineers engaged in a Knowledge Transfer Partnership to develop a novel walking frame that reduces the need for lifting during everyday tasks. This paper presents the results for the final prototype regarding stability, safety and other aspects of usability.

methodsFour studies were conducted that explored the prototype in relation to the current standard frame: a detailed gait lab study of 9 healthy older adults performing repeated trials for a range of everyday tasks provided mechanical measures of stability, a real-world study that involved 9 users of walking frames provided measures of body weight transfer and lifting events, two interview studies (5 healthcare professionals and 7 users of walking frames) elicited stakeholder perceptions regarding stability, safety and usability.

resultsAnalysis of healthy older adults using a standard walking frame and the prototype frame demonstrated that the prototype increases stability during performance of complex everyday tasks (p < 0.05). Similarly, gait assessments of walking frame users in their home environment showed that the prototype facilitated safer usage patterns and provided greater and more continuous body weight support. Interviews with healthcare professionals and users showed that the prototype was perceived to be safe and effective and hence more usable.

conclusionsThe outcomes of the separate studies all support the same conclusion: the prototype is an improvement on the status quo, the typical front-wheeled Zimmer frame for indoor use which has not changed in design for decades. The significance of this work lies in the success of the Knowledge Transfer Partnership and in biomechanics-informed design leading to improvements, which in future may be applied to other walking aids, to benefit walking aid users by promoting safer, more stable use of their aid.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingAccidental FallsAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaBody WeightHumansDesignStabilityUsabilityWalking frame

Identifiers

PMID37957568
PMCPMC10642022
OpenAlexW4388637152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.