Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023
The effect of warming ropivacaine on ultrasound-guided subgluteal sciatic nerve block: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Thermography in Anesthetic Peripheral Nerve Blocks When Using Different Local Anesthetics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of temperature on ECFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a long latent period for the sciatic nerve block before a satisfactory block is attained. Changes in the temperature of local anesthetics may influence the characters of the peripheral nerve block. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of warming ropivacaine on the ultrasound-guided subgluteal sciatic nerve block.
methodsFifty-four patients for distal lower limbs surgery were randomly allocated into warming group (group W, n = 27) or room tempeture group (group R, n = 27) with the ultrasound-guided subgluteal sciatic nerve block. The group W received 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% at 30℃ and the group R received 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% at 23℃. The sensory and motor blockade were assessed every 2 min for 30 min after injection. The primary outcome was the onset time of limb sensory blockade.
resultsThe onset time of sensory blockade was shorter in group W than in group R (16 (16,18) min vs 22 (20,23) min, p < 0.001), and the onset time of motor blockade was also shorter in group W than in group R (22 (20,24) min vs 26 (24,28) min, p < 0.001). The onset time of sensory blockade for each nerve was shorter in group W than in group R (p < 0.001). No obvious differences for the duration of sensory and motor blockade and the patient satisfaction were discovered between both groups. No complications associated with nerve block were observed 2 days after surgery.
conclusionsWarming ropivacaine 0.5% to 30℃ accelerates the onset time of sensory and motor blockade in the ultrasound-guided subgluteal sciatic nerve block and it has no influence on the duration of sensory and motor blockade.
trial registrationThe trial was registered on October 3, 2022 in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=181104 ), registration number ChiCTR2200064350 (03/10/2022).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.