Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957523›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2024

The Impact of Biosimilar Use on Total Cost of Care and Provider Financial Performance in the Medicare Oncology Care Model: A Population-Based Simulation Study.

Jingyan Yang, Basit I Chaudhry, Andrew T Yue, Joshua A Roth, John M Kelton, Ahmed Shelbaya, Lisa Tran, Meng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jingyan YangGlobal Access and Value, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Basit I ChaudhryDistrict of Columbia, Tuple Health, Washington, USA.
Andrew T YueDistrict of Columbia, Tuple Health, Washington, USA.
Joshua A RothGlobal Access and Value, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
John M KeltonMedical Affairs, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Ahmed ShelbayaGlobal Access and Value, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Lisa TranDistrict of Columbia, Tuple Health, Washington, USA.
Meng LiCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. meng.li@tuftsmedicine.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-7872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPayment for oncology care is increasingly moving from fee-for-service to value-based payment (VBP). VBPs are agreements in which providers are held accountable for total cost of care (TCOC) through risk-sharing arrangements with payers that tie reimbursement levels to TCOC benchmarks. Oncology biosimilars may play an important role in managing financial risk in the VBPs like Medicare's Oncology Care Model (OCM), but there has been limited research in this area. The objective of this study is to estimate the impact of biosimilar adoption on TCOC and oncology provider financial performance under the terms of the Medicare OCM.

methodsWe conducted a population-based simulation study using the Medicare Limited Data Set (LDS) and the methodology of Medicare's OCM. The primary outcome was the simulated average change in TCOC per 6-month episode of care attributable to use of biosimilars as an alternative to reference products. The study population consisted of episodes of care in 2020 and using the reference product or corresponding biosimilar for bevacizumab, rituximab, trastuzumab, epoetin alfa, filgrastim, or pegfilgrastim. TCOC was calculated for each episode of care with use of reference products only and compared with TCOC with corresponding biosimilars. The simulation calculated TCOC outcomes in cohorts of 100 episodes sampled from the Medicare LDS study population using a Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations.

resultsAmong the total of 8281 6-month oncology care episodes identified in the study period (initiating January 2020 to July 2020) in Medicare claims, 1586 (19.2%) episodes met OCM and study criteria and were included. Applying the simulation methods to these observed episodes, biosimilar substitution reduced mean TCOC per episode by $1193 (95% CI $583-1840). The cost reduction from biosimilars represented 2.4% of the average TCOC benchmark and led to a 15% reduction in the risk of providers needing to pay recoupments to Medicare for exceeding TCOC benchmarks.

conclusionsOn the basis of our simulation study using observed Medicare claims and OCM criteria, we found that biosimilar substitution for reference products can significantly lower episode TCOC and improve provider financial performance under the terms of the largest value-based payment model implemented to date.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsMedicareAgedFee-for-Service PlansHumansMedical OncologyUnited StatesBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsBevacizumabBiosimilarsEpoetin alfaFilgrastimInterchangeabilityOncology care modelPegfilgrastimRituximabTrastuzumabValue-based care

Identifiers

PMID37957523
PMCPMC10796518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.