ReviewIrish journal of medical science2024
Excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease - is it time to question an old dogma?
Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is hemorrhoidal surgery really unsafe in inflammatory bowel disease? Results from the HEAD-IBD multicenter study on behalf of IG-IBD.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- Surgical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: From the gastroenterologist's stand-point.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHaemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease is controversial due to fears over poor wound healing leading to proctectomy. We aim to review the available literature and establish the role of excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease.
methodsA review of the current scientific literature was conducted using Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials. Clinical trials from 2005 to present, reporting outcomes of excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease, were included. Review articles and case reports were excluded.
resultsA cohort of 67 patients across four studies was included in this review. There were no reported cases of proctectomy related to haemorrhoidectomy or poor wound healing. One patient (1.5%) had a non-healing wound post-operatively. Four (6%) cases of post-operative bleeding were identified, two (3%) patients were diagnosed with anal fissures and two (3%) were treated after developing perianal abscess post-procedure. There was one (1.5%) case of urinary retention, and one (1.5%) subject developed an anal stricture.
conclusionThe current available evidence suggests a role for excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease patients with well-controlled symptomatic disease, though further prospective analysis is certainly warranted. The preferred operation (open vs closed) remains unclear. FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS: Further prospective trials are required to investigate the optimal approach to haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.