Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957398›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2024

Beneficial applications of biofilms.

Laura-Alina Philipp, Katja Bühler, Roland Ulber, Johannes Gescher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Opinion on Biofilms as Production Systems.Microbial biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Biotechnology revival:Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura-Alina PhilippHamburg University of Technology, Institute of Technical Microbiology, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3247-9103
Katja BühlerDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany.
Roland UlberRPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, Institute of Bioprocess Engineering, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Johannes GescherHamburg University of Technology, Institute of Technical Microbiology, Hamburg, Germany. johannes.gescher@tuhh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-8810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many microorganisms live in the form of a biofilm. Although they are feared in the medical sector, biofilms that are composed of non-pathogenic organisms can be highly beneficial in many applications, including the production of bulk and fine chemicals. Biofilm systems are natural retentostats in which the biocatalysts can adapt and optimize their metabolism to different conditions over time. The adherent nature of biofilms allows them to be used in continuous systems in which the hydraulic retention time is much shorter than the doubling time of the biocatalysts. Moreover, the resilience of organisms growing in biofilms, together with the potential of uncoupling growth from catalytic activity, offers a wide range of opportunities. The ability to work with continuous systems using a potentially self-advancing whole-cell biocatalyst is attracting interest from a range of disciplines, from applied microbiology to materials science and from bioengineering to process engineering. The field of beneficial biofilms is rapidly evolving, with an increasing number of applications being explored, and the surge in demand for sustainable and biobased solutions and processes is accelerating advances in the field. This Review provides an overview of the research topics, challenges, applications and future directions in beneficial and applied biofilm research.

Indexed as

BioengineeringBiofilms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.