Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957351›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

Flexible control of vocal timing in Carollia perspicillata bats enables escape from acoustic interference.

Ava Kiai, Jan Clemens, Manfred Kössl, David Poeppel, Julio Hechavarría

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Looking ahead: echolocation and flight behaviors of two fruit bat species navigating a corridor.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Neuronal activity underlying vocal production in bats.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ava KiaiInstitute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. avakiai@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6996-0868
Jan ClemensEuropean Neuroscience Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Manfred KösslInstitute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
David PoeppelErnst Strüngmann Institute, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0184-163X
Julio HechavarríaInstitute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. hechavarria@bio.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9277-2339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In natural environments, background noise can degrade the integrity of acoustic signals, posing a problem for animals that rely on their vocalizations for communication and navigation. A simple behavioral strategy to combat acoustic interference would be to restrict call emissions to periods of low-amplitude or no noise. Using audio playback and computational tools for the automated detection of over 2.5 million vocalizations from groups of freely vocalizing bats, we show that bats (Carollia perspicillata) can dynamically adapt the timing of their calls to avoid acoustic jamming in both predictably and unpredictably patterned noise. This study demonstrates that bats spontaneously seek out temporal windows of opportunity for vocalizing in acoustically crowded environments, providing a mechanism for efficient echolocation and communication in cluttered acoustic landscapes.

Indexed as

ChiropteraEcholocationAcousticsAnimalsNoiseVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID37957351
PMCPMC10643407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.