Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957301›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

The use of a porcine model to teach advanced abdominal wall dissection techniques.

Mathew Ollapallil Jacob, Alex Karatassas, Peter Hewett, Mina Guirgis, Chris Hensman, Rick Catterwell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mathew Ollapallil JacobLyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, SA, Australia. Matt.o.jacob@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5692-8241
Alex KaratassasUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Peter HewettUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Mina GuirgisUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Chris HensmanUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Rick CatterwellUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AUQueen Elizabeth Hospital · AULyell McEwin Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the era of minimally invasive surgery, it is clear that a robust simulation model is required for the training of surgeons in advanced abdominal wall reconstruction. The purpose of this experimentation was to evaluate whether a porcine model could be used to teach advanced minimally invasive abdominal wall dissection techniques to novice surgeons. Secondary objectives included: time to completion, identification of various anatomical landmarks, to note the difference in porcine and human models and finally, the ability to dock a Da Vinci Xi robotic platform on the porcine model. METHODOLOGY: Two post-fellowship surgeons were given the task of performing an extended total extraperitoneal dissection (ETEP) on one female Landrace pig under the supervision of a surgeon experienced in robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair. This included insertion of ports, developing a retro-rectus plane, crossover from left to right rectus, bilateral transverse abdominus release, and sub-diaphragmatic dissection. A 5-mm vessel sealer was used to facilitate the dissection. The steps of the surgery were given to the trainees, and an experienced hernia surgeon guided the steps of dissection. The emphasis of the tasks was to develop the planes of extraperitoneal dissection to demonstrate that the porcine model could be considered for a viable and realistic model for training.

resultsThe candidates were able to successfully complete the task and dock a Da Vinci Xi with the porcine model providing a realistic platform for training.

conclusionThe porcine model can be a considerable tool in the education of surgeons embarking on learning the art of minimally invasive abdominal wall reconstruction techniques. The advantage of live tissue dissection, similarity in anatomy and the relatively inexpensive availability of porcine models, makes it an unparalleled form of simulation-based training. We believe that this will have transitional capabilities to robotic ETEP education for complex hernia repair.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallHernia, VentralLaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsAnimalsFemaleHerniorrhaphyHumansSurgical MeshSwineAbdominal wall reconstructionHerniaPorcine modelSimulation-based training

Identifiers

PMID37957301
OpenAlexW4388623177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.