Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957231›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

Degeneracy in the neurological model of auditory speech repetition.

Noor Sajid, Andrea Gajardo-Vidal, Justyna O Ekert, Diego L Lorca-Puls, Thomas M H Hope, David W Green, Karl J Friston, Cathy J Price

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Noor SajidWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, QS Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK. noor.sajid.18@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1904-2887
Andrea Gajardo-VidalWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, QS Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Justyna O EkertWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, QS Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Diego L Lorca-PulsWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, QS Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Thomas M H HopeWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, QS Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0714-8545
David W GreenExperimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Karl J FristonWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, QS Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7984-8909
Cathy J PriceWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, QS Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M023672/1Medical Research Council MR/S502522/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 205103/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both classic and contemporary models of auditory word repetition involve at least four left hemisphere regions: primary auditory cortex for processing sounds; pSTS (within Wernicke's area) for processing auditory images of speech; pOp (within Broca's area) for processing motor images of speech; and primary motor cortex for overt speech articulation. Previous functional-MRI (fMRI) studies confirm that auditory repetition activates these regions, in addition to many others. Crucially, however, contemporary models do not specify how regions interact and drive each other during auditory repetition. Here, we used dynamic causal modelling, to test the functional interplay among the four core brain regions during single auditory word and pseudoword repetition. Our analysis is grounded in the principle of degeneracy-i.e., many-to-one structure-function relationships-where multiple neural pathways can execute the same function. Contrary to expectation, we found that, for both word and pseudoword repetition, (i) the effective connectivity between pSTS and pOp was predominantly bidirectional and inhibitory; (ii) activity in the motor cortex could be driven by either pSTS or pOp; and (iii) the latter varied both within and between individuals. These results suggest that different neural pathways can support auditory speech repetition. This degeneracy may explain resilience to functional loss after brain damage.

Indexed as

Motor CortexSpeechBrainBrain MappingHumansModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID37957231
PMCPMC10643365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.