Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957084›Full record

ReviewCurrent problems in pediatric and adolescent health care2023

Innovations in social health delivery to advance equitable pediatric and adolescent life course health development: A review and roadmap forward.

Patrick Y Liu, Steve Spiker, Monique Holguin, Adam Schickedanz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick Y LiuMedical and Imaging Informatics (MII) Group, Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States. Electronic address: pyliu@mednet.ucla.edu.
Steve SpikerOne Degree, Inc., 360 Grand Ave, Unit 190, Oakland, California, United States.
Monique HolguinDepartment of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Adam SchickedanzDepartment of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States; Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, United States.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001883 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALEX BUI, Nina Thawata Harawa · 2016 to 2026
$8.6M
Effectiveness & Implementation of Medical-Financial Partnerships for Parent Health-Related Quality of Life and Child Developmental RiskK23HD099308 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SCHICKEDANZ, ADAM · 2019 to 2023
$885k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001883NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD099308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognizing the influence of social determinants on health and development, health care has increasingly advocated for interventions that target upstream factors as part of routine pediatric care delivery. In response, clinic-based social risk screening and referral programs have proliferated wherein patients are screened for health-related social needs (HRSNs, such as food and housing insecurity) and referred to community-based organizations (CBOs) and social service providers to address those needs. In recent years, an array of digital platforms, known as Social Health Access and Referral Platforms (SHARPs), have emerged to facilitate the scale and implementation of these models amidst growing system demand. Recent evidence on the effectiveness of social risk screen and refer models and SHARPs has been mixed, giving researchers pause and calling for more nuanced understanding of the limitations of such models, especially for promoting child and family health. Design thinking informed by the Life-Course Health Development (LCHD) framework provides a particularly useful lens for synthesizing emerging limitations of such models in the pediatric context, given the dynamic and developmentally-driven circumstances that shape family health and well-being in the early life course. By (1) focusing on addressing deficits-based social risks, (2) scoping to act upon narrow, downstream needs, (3) timing to react to social needs that have already caused harm rather than preventing them, and (4) limiting scale to individual-by-individual responses rather than structural and population-wide interventions, the current design of prevailing social risk screen and refer programs fundamentally limits their potential impact and misses opportunities to improve health equity over the life course. How can health care, social care, and technology partners move forward in collaboration with families and communities to better support equitable lifelong health and social development? In this narrative review, we will summarize the current design, implementation, and limitations of the predominant social risk screen and refer approach in the context of early childhood and adolescent care delivery. We then will apply LCHD principles to advance and improve on this approach from a reactionary focus towards a Family Journey Model that better supports life course health development.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareLife Change EventsAdolescentAdolescent HealthChildChild, PreschoolHumans

Identifiers

PMID37957084
PMCPMC10802152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.