Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37957014›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Neural Circuits Underlying Multifeature Extraction in the Retina.

Prathyusha Ravi Chander, Laura Hanson, Pavitra Chundekkad, Gautam Bhagwan Awatramani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anomalous contrast as an adaptive violation of the Talbot-Plateau law.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Retinal ganglion cells encode the direction of motion outside their classical receptive field.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Compartmentalized pooling generates orientation selectivity in wide-field amacrine cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prathyusha Ravi ChanderDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 4A4, Canada.
Laura HansonDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 4A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8737-9513
Pavitra ChundekkadDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 4A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3367-037X
Gautam Bhagwan AwatramaniDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 4A4, Canada gautam@uvic.ca.
University of Victoria · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classic ON-OFF direction-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs) that encode the four cardinal directions were recently shown to also be orientation-selective. To clarify the mechanisms underlying orientation selectivity, we employed a variety of electrophysiological, optogenetic, and gene knock-out strategies to test the relative contributions of glutamate, GABA, and acetylcholine (ACh) input that are known to drive DSGCs, in male and female mouse retinas. Extracellular spike recordings revealed that DSGCs respond preferentially to either vertical or horizontal bars, those that are perpendicular to their preferred-null motion axes. By contrast, the glutamate input to all four DSGC types measured using whole-cell patch-clamp techniques was found to be tuned along the vertical axis. Tuned glutamatergic excitation was heavily reliant on type 5A bipolar cells, which appear to be electrically coupled via connexin 36 containing gap junctions to the vertically oriented processes of wide-field amacrine cells. Vertically tuned inputs are transformed by the GABAergic/cholinergic "starburst" amacrine cells (SACs), which are critical components of the direction-selective circuit, into distinct patterns of inhibition and excitation. Feed-forward SAC inhibition appears to "veto" preferred orientation glutamate excitation in dorsal/ventral (but not nasal/temporal) coding DSGCs "flipping" their orientation tuning by 90° and accounts for the apparent mismatch between glutamate input tuning and the DSGC's spiking response. Together, these results reveal how two distinct synaptic motifs interact to generate complex feature selectivity, shedding light on the intricate circuitry that underlies visual processing in the retina.

Indexed as

RetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsAmacrine CellsAnimalsFemaleGlutamic AcidMaleMiceNeural InhibitionPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionGlutamic Acidconnexin 36direction-selectiveDSGCsorientation-selectiveretinastarburst amacrine cell

Identifiers

PMID37957014
PMCPMC10919202
OpenAlexW4388623539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.