Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37956993›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2024

Suspected tick-borne flavivirus meningoencephalomyelitis in dogs from the UK: six cases (2021).

V Gonzalo-Nadal, A Kohl, M Rocchi, B Brennan, J Hughes, J Nichols, A Da Silva Filipe, J I Dunlop, M Fares, J J Clark and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

V Gonzalo-NadalDivision of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
A KohlMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.
M RocchiMoredun Research Institute, Midlothian, UK.
B BrennanMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.
J HughesMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.
J NicholsMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.
A Da Silva FilipeMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.
J I DunlopMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.
M FaresMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.
J J ClarkMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.
R TandavanitjMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.
A H PatelMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK.
A Cloquell-MiroDivision of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
J BongersDivision of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
J DeaconMoorview Vets, Cramlington, UK.
A KaczmarskaDivision of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
C StalinDivision of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
T LiatisQueen Mother Hospital for Animals, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, UK.
J IrvingPathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
R Gutierrez-QuintanaDivision of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
MRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics · CZMoredun Research Institute · GBRoyal Veterinary College · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00034/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/2Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/8Medical Research Council MC_UU_12018/12Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 210462/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTick-borne encephalitis virus and louping ill virus are neurotropic flaviviruses transmitted by ticks. Epidemiologically, tick-borne encephalitis is endemic in Europe whereas louping ill's predominant geographical distribution is the UK. Rarely, these flaviviruses affect dogs causing neurological signs. This case series aimed to describe the clinical, clinicopathological, and imaging findings, as well as the outcomes in six dogs with meningoencephalitis and/or meningomyelitis caused by a flavivirus in the UK in 2021. MATERIALS AND

methodsObservational retrospective case-series study. Clinical data were retrieved from medical records of dogs with positive serological or immunohistochemical results from three different institutions from spring to winter 2021.

resultsSix dogs were included in the study. All dogs presented an initial phase of pyrexia and/or lethargy followed by progressive signs of spinal cord and/or intracranial disease. Magnetic resonance imaging showed bilateral and symmetrical lesions affecting the grey matter of the thalamus, pons, medulla oblongata, and thoracic or lumbar intumescences with none or mild parenchymal and meningeal contrast enhancement. Serology for tick-borne encephalitis virus was positive in five dogs with the presence of seroconversion in two dogs. The viral distinction between flaviviruses was not achieved. One dog with negative serology presented positive immunohistochemistry at post-mortem examination. Three dogs survived but presented neurological sequelae. Three dogs were euthanased due to the rapid progression of the clinical signs or static neurological signs. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: These cases raise awareness of the presence of tick-borne encephalitis as an emergent disease or the increased prevalence of louping ill virus affecting dogs in the UK.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesEncephalitis, Tick-BorneEncephalitis Viruses, Tick-BorneTicksAnimalsDogsRetrospective StudiesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID37956993
PMCPMC11497270
OpenAlexW4388647764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.