ArticleAnalytical chemistry2023
Deciphering Solution and Gas-Phase Interactions between Peptides and Lipids by Native Mass Spectrometry.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Surface Charge of Amphiphilic Peptides on Peptide-Lipid Interactions in the Gas Phase and in Solution.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Native Mass Spectrometry Reveals Binding Interactions of SARS-CoV-2 PLpro with Inhibitors and Cellular Targets.ACS infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Simultaneous Native Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Single and Double Mutants To Probe Lipid Binding to Membrane Proteins.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many biological processes depend on the interactions between proteins and lipids. Accordingly, the analysis of protein-lipid complexes has become increasingly important. Native mass spectrometry is often used to identify and characterize specific protein-lipid interactions. However, it requires the transfer of the analytes into the gas phase, where electrostatic interactions are enhanced and hydrophobic interactions do not exist. Accordingly, the question remains whether interactions that are observed in the gas phase accurately reflect interactions that are formed in solution. Here, we systematically explore noncovalent interactions between the antimicrobial peptide LL-37 and glycerophospholipids containing different headgroups or varying in fatty acyl chain length. We observe differences in peak intensities for different peptide-lipid complexes, as well as their relative binding strength in the gas phase. Accordingly, we found that ion intensities and gas-phase stability correlate well for complexes formed by electrostatic interactions. Probing hydrophobic interactions by varying the length of fatty acyl chains, we detected differences in ion intensities based on hydrophobic interactions formed in solution. The relative binding strength of these peptide-lipid complexes revealed only minor differences originating from van der Waals interactions and different binding modes of lipid headgroups in solution. In summary, our results demonstrate that hydrophobic interactions are reflected by ion intensities, while electrostatic interactions, including van der Waals interactions, determine the gas-phase stability of complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.