Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37956652›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Data augmentation using generative models for track intrusion detection.

Soohyung Lee, Beomseong Kim, Heesung Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Soohyung LeeDepartment of Railroad Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Uiwang-si, South Korea.
Beomseong KimDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Gyeonggi University of Science and Technology, Siheung-si, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4394-2260
Heesung LeeDepartment of Railroad Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Uiwang-si, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9944-3976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this work is to address the problem of detecting track intruders in railway systems using deep learning-based algorithms. Unauthorized entry onto railway tracks poses a significant risk of collisions between trains and humans. However, intrusion discrimination algorithms often suffer from a lack of learning data and data imbalance issues. To overcome these challenges, this research proposes an algorithm that combines generative models and classification networks. Generative models are utilized to generate synthetic intrusion data by learning the underlying distribution of available data and creating new samples resembling the original data. The augmented intrusion data is then used to train deep neural networks to accurately identify intrusions. The proposed algorithm is evaluated using real data sets, demonstrating its effectiveness in overcoming limited learning data and data imbalance issues. By augmenting intrusion data using generative models, the algorithm achieves improved accuracy compared to traditional approaches. In conclusion, the algorithm presented in this work provides a solution for detecting track intruders in railway systems. By leveraging generative models to augment limited intrusion data and utilizing classification networks for intrusion discrimination, the algorithm demonstrates improved performance in accurately identifying intrusions. This research highlights the potential of deep learning-based approaches in enhancing railway safety and recommends further exploration and application of these methods in real-world settings.

Indexed as

computer visiondata augmentationdiffusiongenerative modelPix2PixTrack intrusion detection

Identifiers

PMID37956652
PMCPMC10644764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.