Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37956407›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2024

Functional divergence of Arabidopsis REPRESSOR OF UV-B PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS 1 and 2 in repression of flowering.

Song Chen, Roman Podolec, Adriana B Arongaus, Christelle Fuchs, Sylvain Loubéry, Emilie Demarsy, Roman Ulm

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Song ChenDepartment of Plant Sciences, Section of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0726-7114
Roman PodolecDepartment of Plant Sciences, Section of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2998-7892
Adriana B ArongausDepartment of Plant Sciences, Section of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2839-3948
Christelle FuchsDepartment of Plant Sciences, Section of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8181-2294
Sylvain LoubéryDepartment of Plant Sciences, Section of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7061-9456
Emilie DemarsyDepartment of Plant Sciences, Section of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0638-0812
Roman UlmDepartment of Plant Sciences, Section of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8014-7392
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 31003A_175774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoperiodic plants coordinate the timing of flowering with seasonal light cues, thereby optimizing their sexual reproductive success. The WD40-repeat protein REPRESSOR OF UV-B PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS 2 (RUP2) functions as a potent repressor of UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) photoreceptor-mediated UV-B induction of flowering under noninductive, short-day conditions in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana); however, in contrast, the closely related RUP1 seems to play no major role. Here, analysis of chimeric ProRUP1:RUP2 and ProRUP2:RUP1 expression lines suggested that the distinct functions of RUP1 and RUP2 in repressing flowering are due to differences in both their coding and regulatory DNA sequences. Artificial altered expression using tissue-specific promoters indicated that RUP2 functions in repressing flowering when expressed in mesophyll and phloem companion cells, whereas RUP1 functions only when expressed in phloem companion cells. Endogenous RUP1 expression in vascular tissue was quantified as lower than that of RUP2, likely underlying the functional difference between RUP1 and RUP2 in repressing flowering. Taken together, our findings highlight the importance of phloem vasculature expression of RUP2 in repressing flowering under short days and identify a basis for the functional divergence of Arabidopsis RUP1 and RUP2 in regulating flowering time.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisCuesPhloemPromoter Regions, GeneticReproduction

Identifiers

PMID37956407
PMCPMC10904346
OpenAlexW4388621614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.