ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024
MetalHawk: Enhanced Classification of Metal Coordination Geometries by Artificial Neural Networks.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The chemical properties of metal complexes are strongly dependent on the number and geometrical arrangement of ligands coordinated to the metal center. Existing methods for determining either coordination number or geometry rely on a trade-off between accuracy and computational costs, which hinders their application to the study of large structure data sets. Here, we propose MetalHawk (https://github.com/vrettasm/MetalHawk), a machine learning-based approach to perform simultaneous classification of metal site coordination number and geometry through artificial neural networks (ANNs), which were trained using the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) and Metal Protein Data Bank (MetalPDB). We demonstrate that the CSD-trained model can be used to classify sites belonging to the most common coordination numbers and geometry classes with balanced accuracy equal to 96.51% for CSD-deposited metal sites. The CSD-trained model was also found to be capable of classifying bioinorganic metal sites from the MetalPDB database, with balanced accuracy equal to 84.29% on the whole PDB data set and to 91.66% on manually reviewed sites in the PDB validation set. Moreover, we report evidence that the output vectors of the CSD-trained model can be considered as a proxy indicator of metal-site distortions, showing that these can be interpreted as a low-dimensional representation of subtle geometrical features present in metal site structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.