Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37956309›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Electrographic flow mapping of persistent atrial fibrillation: intra- and inter-procedure reproducibility in the absence of 'ground truth'.

Vivek Y Reddy, Melissa H Kong, Jan Petru, Abhishek Maan, Moritoshi Funasako, Kentaro Minami, Peter Ruppersberg, Srinivas Dukkipati, Petr Neuzil

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Electrographic flow mapping of atrial fibrillation.Current opinion in cardiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vivek Y ReddyHelmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, PO Box 1030, NewYork, NY 10029, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5638-4993
Melissa H KongAblacon Inc.,Wheat Ridge, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7140-5935
Jan PetruDepartment of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Roentgenova 37/2, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Abhishek MaanHelmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, PO Box 1030, NewYork, NY 10029, USA.
Moritoshi FunasakoDepartment of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Roentgenova 37/2, Prague 5, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1620-3924
Kentaro MinamiDepartment of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Roentgenova 37/2, Prague 5, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0071-0673
Peter RuppersbergAblacon Inc.,Wheat Ridge, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4612-1778
Srinivas DukkipatiHelmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, PO Box 1030, NewYork, NY 10029, USA.
Petr NeuzilDepartment of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Roentgenova 37/2, Prague 5, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4334-8165
Na Homolce Hospital · CZIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Ablacon
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsValidating mapping systems that identify atrial fibrillation (AF) sources (focal/rotational activity) is confounded by the absence of ground truth. A key concern of prior mapping technologies is spatiotemporal instability, manifesting as poor map reproducibility. Electrographic flow (EGF) employs a novel algorithm that visualizes atrial electrical wavefront propagation to identify putative AF sources. We analysed both intra- (3 min) and inter- (>3 months) procedure EGF map reproducibility. METHODS AND

resultsIn 23 persistent AF patients, after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), EGF maps were generated from 3 serial 1 min recordings using a 64-electrode basket mapping catheter (triplets) at right and left atrial locations. Source prevalence from map triplets was compared between recordings. Per protocol, 12 patients returned for 3-month remapping (1 non-inducible): index procedure post-PVI EGF maps were compared with initial EGF remapping at 3-month redo. Intra-procedure reproducibility: analysing 224 map triplets (111 right atrium, 113 left atrium) revealed a high degree of map consistency with minimal min-to-min shifts: 97 triplets (43%), exact match of leading sources on all 3 maps; 95 triplets (42%), leading source within 1 electrode space on 2 of 3 maps; and 32 triplets (14%), chaotic leading source pattern. Average deviation in source prevalence over 60 s was low (6.4%). Inter-procedure reproducibility: spatiotemporal stability of EGF mapping >3 months was seen in 16 of 18 (89%) sources mapped in 12 patients with (re)inducible AF.

conclusionElectrographic flow mapping generates reproducible intra- and inter-procedural maps, providing rationale for randomized clinical trials targeting these putative AF sources.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPulmonary VeinsEpidermal Growth FactorHeart AtriaHumansReproducibility of ResultsTreatment OutcomeEpidermal Growth FactorBasket catheterElectrographic flow mappingPanoramic mappingPersistent atrial fibrillation

Identifiers

PMID37956309
PMCPMC10642765
OpenAlexW4388625254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.