Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37956167›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Experiences and lessons learned from community-engaged recruitment for the South Asian breast cancer study in New Jersey during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jaya M Satagopan, Tina Dharamdasani, Shailja Mathur, Racquel E Kohler, Elisa V Bandera, Anita Y Kinney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding the family financial toxicity of cancer through the lens of US patients of South Asian descent.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jaya M SatagopanDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6612-4856
Tina DharamdasaniDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.
Shailja MathurDepartment of Family and Community Health Sciences, Cooperative Extension, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.
Racquel E KohlerDepartment of Health Behavior, Society & Policy, School of Public Health, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1017-3832
Elisa V BanderaCancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.
Anita Y KinneyDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSouth Asians are a rapidly growing population in the United States. Breast cancer is a major concern among South Asian American women, who are an understudied population. We established the South Asian Breast Cancer (SABCa) study in New Jersey during early 2020 to gain insights into their breast cancer-related health attitudes. Shortly after we started planning for the study, the COVID-19 disease spread throughout the world. In this paper, we describe our experiences and lessons learned from recruiting study participants by partnering with New Jersey's community organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe used a cross-sectional design. We contacted 12 community organizations and 7 (58%) disseminated our study information. However, these organizations became considerably busy with pandemic-related needs. Therefore, we had to pivot to alternative recruitment strategies through community radio, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey's Community Outreach and Engagement Program, and Rutgers Cooperative Extension's community health programs. We recruited participants through these alternative strategies, obtained written informed consent, and collected demographic information using a structured survey.

resultsTwenty five women expressed interest in the study, of which 22 (88%) participated. Nine (41%) participants learned about the study through the radio, 5 (23%) through these participants, 1 (4.5%) through a non-radio community organization, and 7 (32%) through community health programs. Two (9%) participants heard about the study from their spouse. All participants were born outside the US, their average age was 52.4 years (range: 39-72 years), and they have lived in the US for an average of 26 years (range: 5-51 years).

conclusionPivoting to alternative strategies were crucial for successful recruitment. Findings suggest the significant potential of broadcast media for community-based recruitment. Family dynamics and the community's trust in our partners also encouraged participation. Such strategies must be considered when working with understudied populations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNew JerseyPandemicsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37956167
PMCPMC10642833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.