Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37956124›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Understanding suicidal ideation-a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire.

Katharina Conrad, Thomas Forkmann, Dajana Schreiber, Tobias Teismann, Heide Glaesmer, Lena Spangenberg, Antje Schönfelder, Nina Hallensleben, Laura Paashaus, Georg Juckel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katharina ConradDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thomas ForkmannDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Dajana SchreiberDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Tobias TeismannFaculty of Psychology, Mental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Heide GlaesmerDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Lena SpangenbergDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Antje SchönfelderDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Nina HallenslebenDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Laura PaashausDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Georg JuckelDepartment of Psychiatry, LWL-University Hospital, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Inken HöllerDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6572-1421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIdentifying various interacting risk factors for suicidality is important to develop preventive measures. The Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior (IPTS) postulates suicidal ideation resulting from the occurrence of Perceived Burdensomeness (PB) and Thwarted Belongingness (TB). Suicidal behavior ultimately occurs if people have a Capability for Suicide. In past studies, the validity of TB was often not empirically confirmed, questioning which of the aspects of TB are central and related to suicidal ideation and whether applied measurement methods adequately capture the construct.

methodUsing a sample of 3,404 individuals from different clinical and nonclinical settings, 30% (1,023) of whom reported suicidal ideation, two network analyses were conducted on the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) and a variable mapping suicidal ideation.

resultsAnalyses revealed that some items of the INQ were not related to suicidal ideation and the most central items did not have the strongest associations to suicidal ideation.

conclusionBased on these results, a shortened version of the INQ with the four items that showed the strongest associations with suicidal ideation in the network analyses was suggested.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationSuicideHumansInterpersonal RelationsPsychological TheoryRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37956124
PMCPMC10642825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.