Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37956000›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2024

Spatial Coherence Approaches to Distinguish Suspicious Mass Contents in Fundamental and Harmonic Breast Ultrasound Images.

Arunima Sharma, Eniola Oluyemi, Kelly Myers, Emily Ambinder, Muyinatu A Lediju Bell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MixTURE: L1-Norm-Based Mixed Second-Order Continuity in Strain Tensor Ultrasound Elastography.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Article
  6. Far-focus compound ultrasound imaging with lag-one coherence-based zero-cross factor.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arunima Sharma
Eniola Oluyemi
Kelly Myers
Emily Ambinder
Muyinatu A Lediju Bell
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Minimizing Uncertainty in Breast Ultrasound Imaging with Real-Time Coherence-Based BeamformingR01EB032960 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BELL, MUYINATU A. LEDIJU · 2022 to 2025
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When compared to fundamental B-mode imaging, coherence-based beamforming, and harmonic imaging are independently known to reduce acoustic clutter, distinguish solid from fluid content in indeterminate breast masses, and thereby reduce unnecessary biopsies during a breast cancer diagnosis. However, a systematic investigation of independent and combined coherence beamforming and harmonic imaging approaches is necessary for the clinical deployment of the most optimal approach. Therefore, we compare the performance of fundamental and harmonic images created with short-lag spatial coherence (SLSC), M-weighted SLSC (M-SLSC), SLSC combined with robust principal component analysis with no M-weighting (r-SLSC), and r-SLSC with M-weighting (R-SLSC), relative to traditional fundamental and harmonic B-mode images, when distinguishing solid from fluid breast masses. Raw channel data acquired from 40 total breast masses (28 solid, 7 fluid, 5 mixed) were beamformed and analyzed. The contrast of fluid masses was better with fundamental rather than harmonic coherence imaging, due to the lower spatial coherence within the fluid masses in the fundamental coherence images. Relative to SLSC imaging, M-SLSC, r-SLSC, and R-SLSC imaging provided similar contrast across multiple masses (with the exception of clinically challenging complicated cysts) and minimized the range of generalized contrast-to-noise ratios (gCNRs) of fluid masses, yet required additional computational resources. Among the eight coherence imaging modes compared, fundamental SLSC imaging best identified fluid versus solid breast mass contents, outperforming fundamental and harmonic B-mode imaging. With fundamental SLSC images, the specificity and sensitivity to identify fluid masses using the reader-independent metrics of contrast difference, mean lag one coherence (LOC), and gCNR were 0.86 and 1, 1 and 0.89, and 1 and 1, respectively. Results demonstrate that fundamental SLSC imaging and gCNR (or LOC if no coherence image or background region of interest is introduced) have the greatest potential to impact clinical decisions and improve the diagnostic certainty of breast mass contents. These observations are additionally anticipated to extend to masses in other organs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsUltrasonography, MammaryAcousticsBreastFemaleHumansPrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID37956000
PMCPMC10851341
OpenAlexW4388624350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.