Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37955965›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2023

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Classification Model Predicting Postoperative Adverse Outcomes in Older Surgical Patients Using a Machine Learning Algorithm: Retrospective Observational Network Study.

Jung-Yeon Choi, Sooyoung Yoo, Wongeun Song, Seok Kim, Hyunyoung Baek, Jun Suh Lee, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Seonghae Yoon, Hae-Young Lee, Kwang-Il Kim

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jung-Yeon Choi *Departmentof Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5139-5346
Sooyoung Yoo *Office of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8620-4925
Wongeun Song *Office of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4314-3995
Seok KimOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4996-8613
Hyunyoung BaekOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0810-9396
Jun Suh LeeDepartment of Surgery, G Sam Hospital, Gunpo, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9487-9826
Yoo-Seok YoonDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7621-8557
Seonghae YoonDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutic, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9438-0045
Hae-Young LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9521-4102
Kwang-Il KimDepartmentof Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6658-047X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults are at an increased risk of postoperative morbidity. Numerous risk stratification tools exist, but effort and manpower are required.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a predictive model of postoperative adverse outcomes in older patients following general surgery with an open-source, patient-level prediction from the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics for internal and external validation.

methodsWe used the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership common data model and machine learning algorithms. The primary outcome was a composite of 90-day postoperative all-cause mortality and emergency department visits. Secondary outcomes were postoperative delirium, prolonged postoperative stay (≥75th percentile), and prolonged hospital stay (≥21 days). An 80% versus 20% split of the data from the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH) and Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) common data model was used for model training and testing versus external validation. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with a 95% CI.

resultsData from 27,197 (SNUBH) and 32,857 (SNUH) patients were analyzed. Compared to the random forest, Adaboost, and decision tree models, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression model showed good internal discriminative accuracy (internal AUC 0.723, 95% CI 0.701-0.744) and transportability (external AUC 0.703, 95% CI 0.692-0.714) for the primary outcome. The model also possessed good internal and external AUCs for postoperative delirium (internal AUC 0.754, 95% CI 0.713-0.794; external AUC 0.750, 95% CI 0.727-0.772), prolonged postoperative stay (internal AUC 0.813, 95% CI 0.800-0.825; external AUC 0.747, 95% CI 0.741-0.753), and prolonged hospital stay (internal AUC 0.770, 95% CI 0.749-0.792; external AUC 0.707, 95% CI 0.696-0.718). Compared with age or the Charlson comorbidity index, the model showed better prediction performance.

conclusionsThe derived model shall assist clinicians and patients in understanding the individualized risks and benefits of surgery.

Indexed as

Emergence DeliriumAgedAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningPrognosisRetrospective Studiesadverse eventadverse outcomeageingalgorithmCDMcommon data modelelderelderlygeriatricmodelObservational Health Data Sciences and InformaticsOHDSIolder adultpatient-level predictionpostoperativepostoperative outcomepredictsurgery

Identifiers

PMID37955965
PMCPMC10682929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.