Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37955821›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2024

Combined Cognitive and Psychological Interventions Improve Meaningful Outcomes after Acquired Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alexandra Davies, Jeffrey M Rogers, Katharine Baker, Lily Li, Joshua Llerena, Roshan das Nair, Dana Wong

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Profiles of Individuals With Long COVID Reporting Persistent Cognitive Complaints.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparing the CO-OP ApproachBrain sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexandra DaviesSchool of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3035-2766
Jeffrey M RogersFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0320-969X
Katharine BakerSchool of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6423-3055
Lily LiSchool of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Joshua LlerenaSchool of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Roshan das NairSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8143-7893
Dana WongSchool of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia. d.wong@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9619-1929
La Trobe University · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventions addressing cognitive and emotional difficulties after acquired brain injury (ABI) often focus on specific impairments in cognition or mood. These interventions can be effective at addressing their specific target, but do not routinely translate to improved activity and participation outcomes. Approaches that combine cognitive and psychological rehabilitation are increasingly popular; however, to date, there have been no systematic evaluations of their efficacy. We conducted a systematic review of five databases, searching for randomised controlled trials of adults with diagnoses of non-progressive ABI at least 1-month post injury, in receipt of interventions that combined cognitive and psychological components compared to any control. Screening and data extraction were evaluated by two independent reviewers using a standardised protocol. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedge's g and estimated using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the PEDro-P rating system, and quality of evidence evaluated using the grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 684). There was an overall small-to-medium effect (g = 0.42) for combined interventions compared with controls, with gains maintained at 6-month follow-up. Improvements were observed at the level of impairment, activity, participation and quality of life. GRADE ratings and analyses investigating sensitivity, heterogeneity and publication bias indicated that these effects were robust. No a priori variables moderated these effects. Overall, this review provides strong evidence that combined cognitive and psychological interventions create meaningful change in the lives of people with ABI.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansPsychosocial InterventionQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAcquired brain injuryCognitionCognitive rehabilitationCombined interventionEmotionPsychological therapyRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37955821
PMCPMC11606985
OpenAlexW4388635915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.