Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37955812›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2024

Quantitative Gait and Balance Outcomes for Ataxia Trials: Consensus Recommendations by the Ataxia Global Initiative Working Group on Digital-Motor Biomarkers.

Winfried Ilg, Sarah Milne, Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch, Lisa Alcock, Lukas Beichert, Enrico Bertini, Norlinah Mohamed Ibrahim, Helen Dawes, Christopher M Gomez, Hasmet Hanagasi and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06692296 (Studio Pilota Sull'Efficacia Della Pedana Stabilometrica Nel Trattamento Del Paziente Con Atassia di Friedreich), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06692296 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Studio Pilota Sull'Efficacia Della Pedana Stabilometrica Nel Trattamento Del Paziente Con Atassia di Friedreich

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS Eugenio MedeaRan2025 to 2027Enrolled24ConditionsFriedreich AtaxiaArmsBalance training over stabilometric platform, Balance training by means of conventional rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Walking as a Window to the Brain: Redefining Gait in Neurology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Ataxia.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Capture of Longitudinal Change in Real-Life Walking in Cerebellar Ataxia Increases Patient Relevance and Effect Size.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Biomarkers in Spinocerebellar Ataxias.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 15 institutions in 7 countries.

Winfried IlgSection Computational Sensomotorics, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Otfried-Müller-Straße 25, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. winfried.ilg@uni-tuebingen.de.
Sarah MilneBruce Lefroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Tanja Schmitz-HübschExperimental and Clinical Research Center, a cooperation of Max-Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lisa AlcockTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Lukas BeichertDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Enrico BertiniResearch Unit of Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Disorders, Bambino Gesu' Children's Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Norlinah Mohamed IbrahimFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Helen DawesNIHR Exeter BRC, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Christopher M GomezDepartment of Neurology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Hasmet HanagasiBehavioral Neurology and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kirsi M KinnunenIXICO, London, UK.
Martina MinneropInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1)), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Andrea H NémethNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jane NewmanNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Yi Shiau NgWellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Clara RentzInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1)), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Bedia SamanciBehavioral Neurology and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Vrutangkumar V ShahDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Susanna SummaMovement Analysis and Robotics Laboratory (MARLab), Neurorehabilitation Unit, Neurological Science and Neurorehabilitation Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Gessica VascoMovement Analysis and Robotics Laboratory (MARLab), Neurorehabilitation Unit, Neurological Science and Neurorehabilitation Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
James McNamesAPDM Precision Motion, Clario, Portland, OR, USA.
Fay B HorakDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Ataxia Global Initiative (AGI) working group Digital Motor Biomarkers
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITForschungszentrum Jülich · DEIstanbul University · TRMotion Control (United States) · USWellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research · GBHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEIxico (United Kingdom) · GBMax Delbrück Center · DEMonash Health · AUNational University of Malaysia · MYNewcastle University · GBPortland State University · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With disease-modifying drugs on the horizon for degenerative ataxias, ecologically valid, finely granulated, digital health measures are highly warranted to augment clinical and patient-reported outcome measures. Gait and balance disturbances most often present as the first signs of degenerative cerebellar ataxia and are the most reported disabling features in disease progression. Thus, digital gait and balance measures constitute promising and relevant performance outcomes for clinical trials.This narrative review with embedded consensus will describe evidence for the sensitivity of digital gait and balance measures for evaluating ataxia severity and progression, propose a consensus protocol for establishing gait and balance metrics in natural history studies and clinical trials, and discuss relevant issues for their use as performance outcomes.

Indexed as

BiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicGaitPostural BalanceAtaxiaCerebellar AtaxiaGait AnalysisGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansBiomarkersCerebellar ataxiaDigital motor performance markerGait and posture

Identifiers

PMID37955812
PMCPMC11269489
OpenAlexW4388633306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.