Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37955717›Full record

SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Advanced bipolar vessel sealing devices vs conventional bipolar energy in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pier Carlo Zorzato, Filippo Alberto Ferrari, Simone Garzon, Massimo Franchi, Stefano Cianci, Antonio Simone Laganà, Vito Chiantera, Jvan Casarin, Fabio Ghezzi, Stefano Uccella

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Electrosurgical Devices Used During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Utilization of LigasureJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pier Carlo ZorzatoUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Gynecology, University of Verona, AOUI Verona, Verona, Italy.
Filippo Alberto FerrariUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Gynecology, University of Verona, AOUI Verona, Verona, Italy.
Simone GarzonUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Gynecology, University of Verona, AOUI Verona, Verona, Italy. simone.garzon@univr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5840-699X
Massimo FranchiUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Gynecology, University of Verona, AOUI Verona, Verona, Italy.
Stefano CianciDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Antonio Simone LaganàDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Vito ChianteraDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Jvan CasarinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Filippo Del Ponte Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Fabio GhezziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Filippo Del Ponte Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Stefano UccellaUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Gynecology, University of Verona, AOUI Verona, Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare conventional bipolar electrosurgery with advanced bipolar vessel sealing (ABVS) devices for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).

methodsA systematic review was conducted by searching Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library from January 1989 to November 2021. We identified all studies comparing ABVS devices with conventional bipolar electrosurgery in TLH and reporting at least one of the following outcomes: total blood loss, total operative time, hospital stay, perioperative complications, or costs. Meta-analysis was conducted with a random effect model reporting pooled mean differences and odds ratios (ORs) with related 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsTwo randomized controlled trials and two retrospective studies encompassing 314 patients were included out of 615 manuscripts. The pooled estimated total blood loss in the ABVS devices group was lower than conventional bipolar electrosurgery of 39 mL (95% CI - 65.8 to - 12.6 mL; p = .004). The use of ABVS devices significantly reduced the total operative time by 8 min (95% CI - 16.7 to - 0.8 min; p = .033). Hospital stay length did not differ between the two groups, and a comparable overall surgical complication rate was observed [OR of 0.9 (95% CI 0.256 - 3.200; p = .878].

conclusionsHigh-quality evidence comparing ABVS devices with conventional bipolar electrosurgery for TLH is lacking. ABVS devices were associated with reduced total blood loss and operative time; however, observed differences seem clinically irrelevant. Further research is required to clarify the advantages of ABVS devices over conventional bipolar electrosurgery and to identify cases that may benefit more from their use.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalElectrosurgeryHysterectomyLength of StayOperative TimeFemaleHumansLaparoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdvanced bipolar vessel sealing deviceConventional bipolar instrumentEnergyLaparoscopic hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID37955717
PMCPMC10894136
OpenAlexW4388635019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.