ArticleHuman brain mapping2023
Regular cannabis use alters the neural dynamics serving complex motor control.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetoencephalography in human neuroscience research: planning, piloting, implementation and quality assurance.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- High-definition tDCS of the motor cortex affects prefrontal and primary motor activity differently in young and older adults.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Testosterone modulates multispectral oscillatory activity serving performance of motor sequences in typically developing youth.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Cognitive performance recovery following marijuana cessation in NCAA division I athletes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Regular cannabis use modulates gamma functional connectivity with V1 during visual processing.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Identification and External Validation of a Problem Cannabis Risk Network.Biological psychiatry · 2025Article
- Developmental trajectory of neural activity underlying motor control differs by sequence complexity and motor stage.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- The polarity of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation affects the planning and execution of movement sequences.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Chronic cannabis use differentially modulates neural oscillations serving the manipulate versus maintain components of working memory processing.Neurobiology of disease · 2025Article
- Regular cannabis use modulates gamma activity in brain regions serving motor control.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Regular cannabis use alters the neural dynamics serving complex motor control.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cannabis is the most widely used recreational drug in the United States and regular use has been linked to deficits in attention and memory. However, the effects of regular use on motor control are less understood, with some studies showing deficits and others indicating normal performance. Eighteen users and 23 nonusers performed a motor sequencing task during high-density magnetoencephalography (MEG). The MEG data was transformed into the time-frequency domain and beta responses (16-24 Hz) during motor planning and execution phases were imaged separately using a beamformer approach. Whole-brain maps were examined for group (cannabis user/nonuser) and time window (planning/execution) effects. As expected, there were no group differences in task performance (e.g., reaction time, accuracy, etc.). Regular cannabis users exhibited stronger beta oscillations in the contralateral primary motor cortex compared to nonusers during the execution phase of the motor sequences, but not during the motor planning phase. Similar group-by-time window interactions were observed in the left superior parietal, right inferior frontal cortices, right posterior insular cortex, and the bilateral motor cortex. We observed differences in the neural dynamics serving motor control in regular cannabis users compared to nonusers, suggesting regular users may employ compensatory processing in both primary motor and higher-order motor cortices to maintain adequate task performance. Future studies will need to examine more complex motor control tasks to ascertain whether this putative compensatory activity eventually becomes exhausted and behavioral differences emerge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.