Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37955121›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology2023

A critical discussion on the relationship between E3 ubiquitin ligases, protein degradation, and skeletal muscle wasting: it's not that simple.

David C Hughes, Craig A Goodman, Leslie M Baehr, Paul Gregorevic, Sue C Bodine

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David C HughesAging and Metabolism Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5433-8782
Craig A GoodmanCentre for Muscle Research (CMR), Department of Anatomy and Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5874-7743
Leslie M BaehrAging and Metabolism Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8778-3567
Paul GregorevicCentre for Muscle Research (CMR), Department of Anatomy and Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7418-8945
Sue C BodineAging and Metabolism Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5742-9145
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation · USThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

The role of Fbxl22 in the regulation of skeletal muscle massK01AR077684 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HUGHES, DAVID C · 2021 to 2025
$602k
Sarcopenia and recovery from Disuse-Induced AtrophyI01BX005626 · VA · OKLAHOMA CITY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BODINE, SUE C · 2022 to 2025
–
BLRD VA I01 BX005626NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR077684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ubiquitination is an important post-translational modification (PTM) for protein substrates, whereby ubiquitin is added to proteins through the coordinated activity of activating (E1), ubiquitin-conjugating (E2), and ubiquitin ligase (E3) enzymes. The E3s provide key functions in the recognition of specific protein substrates to be ubiquitinated and aid in determining their proteolytic or nonproteolytic fates, which has led to their study as indicators of altered cellular processes. MuRF1 and MAFbx/Atrogin-1 were two of the first E3 ubiquitin ligases identified as being upregulated in a range of different skeletal muscle atrophy models. Since their discovery, the expression of these E3 ubiquitin ligases has often been studied as a surrogate measure of changes to bulk protein degradation rates. However, emerging evidence has highlighted the dynamic and complex regulation of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) in skeletal muscle and demonstrated that protein ubiquitination is not necessarily equivalent to protein degradation. These observations highlight the potential challenges of quantifying E3 ubiquitin ligases as markers of protein degradation rates or ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) activation. This perspective examines the usefulness of monitoring E3 ubiquitin ligases for determining specific or bulk protein degradation rates in the settings of skeletal muscle atrophy. Specific questions that remain unanswered within the skeletal muscle atrophy field are also identified, to encourage the pursuit of new research that will be critical in moving forward our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern protein function and degradation in muscle.

Indexed as

Proteasome Endopeptidase ComplexUbiquitin-Protein LigasesHumansMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophyProteolysisUbiquitinMuscle ProteinsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexUbiquitinUbiquitin-Protein Ligasesatrophydisuseprotein degradationubiquitinationubiquitin proteasome system

Identifiers

PMID37955121
PMCPMC10861180
OpenAlexW4388633217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.