Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37955037›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2023

Safety of the extension of use of 2'-fucosyllactose (2'-FL) as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283.

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA), Dominique Turck, Torsten Bohn, Jacqueline Castenmiller, Stefaan De Henauw, Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst, Alexandre Maciuk, Inge Mangelsdorf, Harry J McArdle, Androniki Naska and 20 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Safety of lacto-N-tetraose (LNT) produced by a derivative strain (EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA)
Dominique Turck
Torsten Bohn
Jacqueline Castenmiller
Stefaan De Henauw
Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst
Alexandre Maciuk
Inge Mangelsdorf
Harry J McArdle
Androniki Naska
Kristina Pentieva
Alfonso Siani
Frank Thies
Sophia Tsabouri
Marco Vinceti
Margarita Aguilera-Gómez
Francesco Cubadda
Thomas Frenzel
Marina Heinonen
Miguel Prieto Maradona
Rosangela Marchelli
Monika Neuhäuser-Berthold
Carmen Peláez
Morten Poulsen
Josef Rudolf Schlatter
Alexandros Siskos
Henk van Loveren
Paolo Colombo
Estefanía Noriega Fernández
Helle Katrine Knutsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the safety of the extension of use of 2'-fucosyllactose (2'-FL) as a novel food (NF) pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. The NF is already authorised as ingredient in several food categories, including infant formula (IF) and follow-on formula (FOF). The applicant proposed to increase the maximum use levels of the NF in IF and FOF. EFSA estimated the anticipated daily intake of the NF from the proposed extension of use, including the already authorised conditions of use in other food categories. Additionally, a new intake estimate limited to the already authorised conditions of use of the NF was carried out following EFSA's current approach. The estimated daily intake of the NF from high consumption of IF alone at the proposed maximum use level in infants < 16 weeks of age is similar to the estimated natural highest mean daily intake of 2'-FL from human milk in breastfed infants. The estimated highest P95 daily intakes of the NF from the proposed extension of use in IF and FOF (including the authorised uses in other food categories) and from the already authorised conditions of use, are comparable and both higher than the estimated natural highest mean daily intake of 2'-FL from human milk in infants and to a lesser extent in young children. The Panel considers that the proposed extension of use of the NF in IF and FOF only marginally affects the highest P95 daily intake estimate from the authorised conditions of use, and therefore does not affect the safety of the NF. The Panel concludes that the NF, 2'-FL, is safe under the proposed conditions of use.

Indexed as

2′‐FL2′‐fucosyllactoseextension of useHiMOinfant formulainfantsnovel foods

Identifiers

PMID37955037
PMCPMC10632945
OpenAlexW4388531669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.