ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
Visualizing interferential stimulation of human brains.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the feasibility of temporal interference stimulation of human brains using two arrays of electrodes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- On the need of individually optimizing temporal interference stimulation of human brains due to inter-individual variability.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The interplay between pulse width and activation depth in TENS: a computational study.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Beyond the surface: a review of transcranial temporal interference stimulation for deep brain modulation.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- On the need of individually optimizing temporal interference stimulation of human brains due to inter-individual variability.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) is limited in focally stimulating deep-brain regions, even with optimized stimulation montages. Recently, interferential stimulation (IFS), also known as transcranial temporal interference stimulation (TI, TIS, or tTIS), has drawn much attention in the TES community as both computational and experimental studies show that IFS can reach deep-brain areas. However, the underlying electrodynamics of IFS is complicated and difficult to visualize. Existing literature only shows static visualization of the interfered electric field induced by IFS. These could result in a simplified understanding that there is always one static focal spot between the two pairs of stimulation electrodes. This static visualization can be frequently found in the IFS literature. Here, we aimed to systematically visualize the entire dynamics of IFS. Methods and results: Following the previous study, the lead field was solved for the MNI-152 head, and optimal montages using either two pairs of electrodes or two arrays of electrodes were found to stimulate a deep-brain region close to the left striatum with the highest possible focality. We then visualized the two stimulating electrical currents injected with similar frequencies. We animated the instant electric field vector at the target and one exemplary off-target location both in 3D space and as a 2D Lissajous curve. We finally visualized the distribution of the interfered electric field and the amplitude modulation envelope at an axial slice going through the target location. These two quantities were visualized in two directions: radial-in and posterior-anterior. Discussion: We hope that with intuitive visualization, this study can contribute as an educational resource to the community's understanding of IFS as a powerful modality for non-invasive focal deep-brain stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.