Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37954935›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction open2023

Use of mesenchymal stem cells to enhance or restore fertility potential: a systematic review of available experimental strategies.

L Cacciottola, F Vitale, J Donnez, M M Dolmans

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ovarian ageing: from biological constraint to emerging therapeutic frontier.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L CacciottolaGynecology Research Unit, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6738-289X
F VitaleGynecology Research Unit, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3792-0276
J DonnezSociety for Research into Infertility, Brussels, Belgium.
M M DolmansGynecology Research Unit, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-3026
UCLouvain · BECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionTo what extent does regenerative medicine with stem cell therapy help to address infertility issues for future clinical application? SUMMARY ANSWER: Regenerative medicine using different stem cell sources is yielding promising results in terms of protecting the ovarian reserve from damage and senescence, and improving fertility potential in various preclinical settings. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Regenerative medicine using stem cell therapy is emerging as a potential strategy to address a number of issues in the field of human reproduction. Indeed, different types of adult and fetal mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been tested with promising results, owing to their ability to differentiate into different tissue lineages, move toward specific injured sites (homing), and generate a secretome with wound-healing, proangiogenic, and antioxidant capacities. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: Guided by the checklist for preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, we retrieved relevant studies from PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases until June 2023 using the following keywords: 'mesenchymal stem cells' AND 'ovarian follicles' OR 'ovarian tissue culture' OR 'ovarian follicle culture' OR 'cumulus oocyte complex'. Only peer-reviewed published articles written in English were included. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsThe primary outcome for the experimental strategies was evaluation of the ovarian reserve, with a focus on follicle survival, number, and growth. Secondary outcomes involved analyses of other parameters associated with the follicle pool, such as hormones and growth factors, ovarian tissue viability markers including oxidative stress levels, oocyte growth and maturation rates, and of course pregnancy outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Preclinical studies exploring MSCs from different animal origins and tissue sources in specific conditions were selected (n = 112), including: LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: While preclinical results look promising in terms of protecting the ovarian reserve in different experimental models (especially those WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsAll gathered data on the one hand show that regenerative medicine techniques are quickly gaining ground among innovative techniques being developed for future clinical application in the field of reproductive medicine. After proving MSC effectiveness in preclinical settings, there is still a lot of work to do before MSCs can be safely and effectively used in different clinical applications. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by grants from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (FNRS-PDR T.0077.14, FNRS-CDR J.0063.20, and grant 5/4/150/5 awarded to Marie-Madeleine Dolmans), Fonds Spéciaux de Recherche, and the Fondation St Luc. None of the authors have any competing interest to disclose. REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

fertility restorationgonadotoxic damageovarian rejuvenationovarian reserveovarian tissue transplantationstem cell therapy

Identifiers

PMID37954935
PMCPMC10637864
OpenAlexW4388274426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.