Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37954918›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2023

Feasibility of home dose optimization of apomorphine sublingual film in Parkinson's disease patients with OFF episodes: results from the dose-optimization phase of an open-label, randomized crossover study.

Jan Kassubek, Fabrizio Stocchi, Ernest Balaguer Martinez, Rajesh Pahwa, William Ondo, Yi Zhang, Alyssa Bowling, Eric Pappert, Stuart Isaacson, Stacy Wu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. On-demand therapies-emergency medication or daily routine?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Sublingual apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Jan KassubekDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7106-9270
Fabrizio StocchiUniversity San Raffaele Roma and Institute for Research and Medical Care IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.
Ernest Balaguer MartinezHospital Universitari General de Catalunya, Calle Pedro i Pons, 1, Barcelona, Spain.
Rajesh PahwaUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
William OndoHouston Methodist Neurological Institute, Scurlock Tower 6560 Fannin St, Houston, TX, USA.
Yi ZhangSunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA.
Alyssa BowlingSunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA.
Eric PappertSunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA.
Stuart IsaacsonParkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Stacy WuSumitomo Pharma America, Inc., 84 Waterford Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8486-5893
CTH-302 Study Investigators*
Sunovion (United States) · USGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEHospital General de Catalunya · ESHouston Methodist · USParkinson's Research and Education Foundation · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dose optimization of sublingual apomorphine (SL-APO), a dopamine agonist for the treatment of OFF episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), has been performed under clinical supervision in clinical trials. SL-APO may be a candidate for home dosing optimization which would be less burdensome for patients. Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of home optimization of SL-APO in patients with PD and OFF episodes. Design: A multicenter, randomized, crossover study comparing SL-APO with subcutaneous apomorphine was conducted, comprising an open-label dose-optimization phase and a treatment phase. This non-comparative analysis focuses on the outcomes of the dose-optimization phase with SL-APO only. Methods: Patients with PD and OFF episodes received SL-APO at an initial dose of 10 mg in the clinic (open-label). Further optimization could continue at home in 5 mg increments during subsequent OFF episodes (maximum dose of 30 mg). Optimization and tolerability were assessed daily by patient-reported feedback Results: Home optimization was continued by 81.4% (83/102) of patients. Of these, 80.7% identified an effective, tolerable dose. Mean time between initial clinic visit and DCV 1 was 6.8 days, and the final optimized dose of SL-APO was 30 mg (mode). In total, 62.7% of patients reported ⩾1 adverse event; the most common included nausea (31.4%), dizziness (9.8%), somnolence (8.8%), dyskinesia (7.8%), and fatigue (5.9%). The safety profile in this study in which most patients performed home dose optimization was consistent with the study utilizing clinic-based optimization. Conclusion: After the first clinic dose, home dose optimization of SL-APO appears feasible in patients with PD and OFF episodes, with most patients identifying their optimal SL-APO dose at home. Trial registration: This study is registered with EudraCT (2016-003456-7): Clinical Trials register - Search for eudract_number:2016-003456-70.

Indexed as

apomorphine sublingual filmdose optimizationOFF episodeParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID37954918
PMCPMC10637145
OpenAlexW4388542783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.