Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37954906›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Pegmolesatide for the treatment of anemia in patients undergoing dialysis: a randomized clinical trial.

Ping Zhang, Yan Jiang, Chunping Xu, Linghui Zhou, Hongguang Zheng, Deqiong Xie, Minghao Guo, Xiangyang Huang, Guoyuan Lu, Hongli Jiang and 37 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03902691 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicenter, Non-Inferiority Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pegol-Sihematide for Anemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease on Dialysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorJiangsu Hansoh Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Ran2019 to 2022Enrolled372ConditionsChronic Kidney DiseasesArmsPegol-Sihematide, ESPO
NCT06946394 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Application of Pegmolesatide in Renal Anemia: the Effectiveness and Safety of Switching to Two Different Regimens of Pegmolesatide in Patients With Non Dialysis CKD Treated With rhuEPO or HIF-PHI

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled160ConditionsRenal Anemia in Non-dialysis Chronic Kidney DiseaseArmsPegmolesatide
NCT07045155 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pegmolesatide for Anemia Treatment:Investigation Upgrade Therapy in rhuEPO Patients Undergoing Dialysis: A Prospective, Multicenter, Parallel-Group, Controlled, Open-Label Study(PANGU-stepup)

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese PLA General HospitalRan2025 to 2028Enrolled240ConditionsDialysis, Complications, Chronic Kidney Disease 5D, Renal Anemia of Chronic Kidney DiseaseArmsThe rHuEPO Monotherapy Group (Control Group), The Pegmolesatide and Roxadustat Combination Therapy Group (Exploratory Group), The Pegmolesatide Monotherapy Group (Experimental group)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

47 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Ping ZhangKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yan JiangKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Chunping XuKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Linghui ZhouThe Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Hongguang ZhengThe Department of Nephrology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shengyang, China.
Deqiong XieThe Department of Nephrology, The Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, China.
Minghao GuoThe Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Xiangyang HuangThe Department of Nephrology, Liuzhou Worker's Hospital, Liuzhou, China.
Guoyuan LuThe Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Hongli JiangThe Department of Blood Purification, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, China.
Hongyu QiuThe Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Bicheng LiuThe Institute of Nephrology, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Shaomei LiThe Department of Nephrology, The Second Hospital of HeBei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Qinkai ChenThe Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yu'ou XiaThe Department of Nephrology, Siping Central People's Hospital, Siping, China.
Bengui SunThe Department of Nephrology, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei, China.
Xiao YangThe Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Shiying ZhangThe Department of Nephrology, Jilin Province People's Hospital, Changchun, China.
Shutong DuThe Department of Nephrology, Cangzhou People's Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Mindan SunThe Department of Nephrology, The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Menghua ChenThe Department of Nephrology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuang, China.
Aimin ZhongThe Department of Nephrology, People's Hospital of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, China.
Xiaoling WangThe Department of Nephrology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Zhanzheng ZhaoThe Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Hua ZhouThe Department of Nephrology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medicine University, Shengyang, China.
Guisen LiThe Department of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences - Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital (SAMSPH), Chengdu, China.
Yueqin RenThe Department of Nephrology, LinYi People's Hospital, Linyi, China.
Qun LuoThe Department of Nephrology, Hwamei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Aicheng YangThe Department of Nephrology, Wuyi Hospital of T.C.M, Jiangmen City (Affiliated Jiangmen TCM Hospital of Jinan University), China.
Ping LuoThe Department of Nephrology, The Second Norman Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Shuifu TangThe Department of Nephrology, The First Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Chengyun XuThe Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Qin WangThe Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Fengxian Center Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoxia WangThe Department of Nephrology, Tong Ren Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tiekun YanThe Department of Nephrology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Wei HeThe Department of Nephrology, Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Shuguang QinThe Department of Nephrology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Weili ZhangThe Department of Nephrology, The First Hospital of Qiqihar, Qiqihar, China.
Lu LvThe Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital/The First Clinical Medicine School of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Cheng WangThe Department of Nephrology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Hong LiuThe Department of Nephrology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jing LiThe Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Qiong WuHansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Chao PanHansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Chuan LiHansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Liangliang HeHansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Jianghua ChenKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Hansoh Pharma (China) · CNNanchang University · CNZhejiang University · CNRenji Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNCentral South University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNFirst Bethune Hospital of Jilin University · CNGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military Region · CNGuangzhou First People's Hospital · CNHebei Medical University · CNJiangmen Wuyi Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital · CNJiangxi Provincial People's Hospital · CNJilin University · CNLinyi People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pegmolesatide, a synthetic peptide-based erythropoietin (EPO) receptor agonist, is being evaluated as an alternative to epoetin alfa for treating anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Chinese dialysis patients. There is a critical need for a long-acting, cost-effective erythropoiesis-stimulating agent that does not produce EPO antibodies. Methods: A randomized, open-label, active-comparator, non-inferiority phase three trial was conducted at 43 dialysis centers in China between May 17th, 2019, and March 28th, 2022. Eligible patients aged 18-70 years were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive pegmolesatide once every four weeks or epoetin alfa one to three times per week, with doses adjusted to maintain a hemoglobin level between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in hemoglobin level from baseline to the efficacy evaluation period in the per-protocol set (PPS) population. Non-inferiority of pegmolesatide to epoetin alfa was established if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the between-group difference was ≥ -1.0 g/dL. Safety assessment included adverse events and potential anaphylaxis reactions. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03902691. Findings: Three hundreds and seventy-two patients were randomly assigned to the pegmolesatide group (248 patients) or the epoetin alfa group (124 patients). A total of 347 patients (233 in the pegmolesatide group and 114 in the epoetin alfa group) were included in the PPS population. In the PPS, the mean change (standard deviation, SD) in hemoglobin level from baseline to the efficacy evaluation period was 0.07 (0.92) g/dL in the pegmolesatide group and -0.22 (0.97) g/dL in the epoetin alfa group. The between-group difference was 0.29 g/dL (95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.47), verifying non-inferiority of pegmolesatide to epoetin alfa. Adverse events occurred in 231 (94%) participants in the pegmolesatide group and in 110 (89%) in the epoetin alfa group. Hypertension was the most common treatment-related adverse event. No fatal cases of anaphylaxis or hypotension were reported. Interpretation: Monthly subcutaneously injection of pegmolesatide was as effective and safe as conventional epoetin alfa administrated one to three times a week in treating anemia in Chinese dialysis patients. Funding: The study was supported by Hansoh Medical Development Group.

Indexed as

AnemiaChronic kidney diseaseDialysisEpoetin alfaPegmolesatide

Identifiers

PMID37954906
PMCPMC10632410
OpenAlexW4388178750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.