ReviewCureus2023
Learner-Centered Experience-Based Medical Education in an AI-Driven Society: A Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving Minds: Natural Learning vs. Artificial Learning in Ophthalmology Training.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Generative AI in perioperative medicine and anesthesiology: ethical integration, educational innovation, and the future of clinical professionalism.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Review
- Exploring the integration of AI and national quality courses in China: a study on teaching practices in nursing smart education.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Medical students' perceptions of professional mission in an AI-driven healthcare future: a text mining analysis of reflective essays in Japan.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2025Article
- Review
- Status and perceptions of ChatGPT utilization among medical students: a survey-based study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Review
- The augmentative role of artificial intelligence in medical education and healthcare practices: an integrative review.Sudanese journal of paediatrics · 2025Review
- Article
- Integrating Simulation-Based Education Into Regional Clinical Clerkship for Future Doctors: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Survey on Medical Students' Attitudes Toward Medical Practice Just Before Clinical Clerkship in Japan.Cureus · 2024Article
- Significance of perioperative inter-departmental collaboration for obstetric emergency response: A mini-review.Acute medicine & surgeryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review proposes and explores the significance of "experience-based medical education" (EXPBME) in the context of an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven society. The rapid advancements in AI, particularly driven by deep learning, have revolutionized medical practices by replicating human cognitive functions, such as image analysis and data interpretation, significantly enhancing efficiency and precision across medical settings. The integration of AI into healthcare presents substantial potential, ranging from precise diagnostics to streamlined data management. However, non-technical skills, such as situational awareness on recognizing AI's fallibility or inherent risks, are critical for future healthcare professionals. EXPBME in a clinical or simulation environment plays a vital role, allowing medical practitioners to navigate AI failures through sufficient reflections. As AI continues to evolve, aligning educational frameworks to nurture these fundamental non-technical skills is paramount to adequately prepare healthcare professionals. Learner-centered EXPBME, combined with the AI literacy acquirement, stands as a key pillar in shaping the future of medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.