Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37954712›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Fentanyl Versus Ondansetron for Shivering Prevention in Cesarean Section: A Comparative Study.

Shaimaa H Hasan, Reabar Haji Qadir, Haider N Mohammed

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shaimaa H HasanAnesthesia Department, College of Health Sciences, University of Duhok, Duhok, IRQ.
Reabar Haji QadirAnesthesia Department, College of Health Sciences, University of Duhok, Duhok, IRQ.
Haider N MohammedAnesthesia Department, College of Health Sciences, University of Duhok, Duhok, IRQ.
University of Duhok · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe incidence of postoperative shivering (PS) following intrathecal anesthesia is a common complication, with potential negative impacts on patient outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of intrathecal fentanyl versus intravenous ondansetron in preventing post-spinal anesthesia shivering in cesarean section patients. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from July 2021 to April 2023, involving pregnant women scheduled for cesarean section under intrathecal anesthesia. The participants were divided into three groups: group F received intrathecal fentanyl (15 μg) with spinal anesthesia, while group O received intravenous ondansetron (8 mg) added to the usual saline solution. The control group (group C) received only intravenous fluid before spinal anesthesia and intrathecal bupivacaine without fentanyl. Shivering occurrences were observed and recorded during the procedure. KEY

resultsThe incidence of shivering was significantly lower in the fentanyl and ondansetron groups compared to the control group (p=0.0123). Both intrathecal fentanyl and intravenous ondansetron administration showed effectiveness in reducing shivering during spinal anesthesia.

conclusionThe administration of intrathecal fentanyl and intravenous ondansetron significantly reduced the occurrence of shivering during spinal anesthesia in cesarean section patients. This study contributes to advancing knowledge in the field by providing evidence of the preventative effects of these medications on post-spinal anesthesia shivering.

Indexed as

anesthesiacesarean sectionintrathecal fentanylondansetronspinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID37954712
PMCPMC10636264
OpenAlexW4387534187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.