ArticleDigital health
Feasibility of using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA-24) dietary assessment tool in older adults.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Dietary patterns can impact the trajectories of healthy aging. However, dietary assessment tools can be challenging to use. With the increased use of technology in older adults, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of older adults completing the online, Automated Self-Administered 24-h (ASA-24) dietary assessment tool. Methods: We conducted a randomized, two-period, two-sequence, crossover design of twenty community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years) comparing their preference for completing the ASA-24 alone versus with a research assistant (RA). Participants were recruited via ResearchMatch.com and randomly allocated 1:1 to a sequence of completing both an ASA-24 alone or with an RA, separated by one week. After each session, participants completed an online 11-item feasibility survey (Likert-scale range of 1-5, strongly disagree to strongly agree). Mean and standard deviations were reported for each question. Results: Mean age was 69 ± 3.5 years (90% females), with no differences were observed for sex, age, race, ethnicity, education, or income. Neither group felt a need for RA assistance ( Conclusion: While older adults were able to complete the ASA-24 independently, the use of an RA led to improved confidence. Enhancing the sample diversity in a larger number of participants could provide helpful data to improve the science of dietary assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.